finance-variance-analysis — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited finance-variance-analysis (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, please ask about available integrations.
Important: This skill assists with variance analysis workflows but does not provide financial advice. All analyses should be reviewed by qualified financial professionals before use in reporting.
Decompose variances into underlying drivers, provide narrative explanations for significant variances, and generate waterfall analysis.
You can ask to analyze variances for a specific area (e.g., "Analyze revenue variance for Q4" or "Explain the flux in OPEX").
area — The area to analyze:revenue — Revenue variance by stream, product, geography, customer segmentopex — Operating expense variance by category, department, cost centercapex — Capital expenditure variance vs budget by project and asset classheadcount — Headcount and compensation variance by department and role levelcogs or cost-of-revenue — Cost of revenue variance by componentgross-margin — Gross margin analysis with mix and rate effectsperiod-comparison — The periods to compare. Formats:2024-12 vs 2024-11 — Month over month2024-12 vs 2023-12 — Year over year2024-Q4 vs 2024-Q3 — Quarter over quarter2024-12 vs budget — Actual vs budget2024-12 vs forecast — Actual vs forecast2024-Q4 vs 2024-Q3 vs 2023-Q4 — Three-way comparisonIf an ERP or data warehouse is connected:
If no data source is connected:
Connect an ERP or data warehouse to pull financial data automatically. To analyze manually, provide:
>
1. Actual data for both comparison periods (at account or line-item detail) 2. Budget/forecast data (if comparing to plan) 3. Any operational metrics that drive the financial results (headcount, volumes, pricing, etc.)
VARIANCE SUMMARY: [Area] — [Period 1] vs [Period 2]
Period 1 Period 2 Variance ($) Variance (%)
-------- -------- ------------ ------------
Total [Area] $XX,XXX $XX,XXX $X,XXX X.X%Break down the total variance into constituent drivers. Use the appropriate decomposition method for the area:
Revenue Decomposition:
Operating Expense Decomposition:
CapEx Decomposition:
Headcount Decomposition:
Generate a text-based waterfall showing how each driver contributes to the total variance:
WATERFALL: [Area] — [Period 1] vs [Period 2]
[Period 2 Base] $XX,XXX
|
|--[+] [Driver 1 description] +$X,XXX
|--[+] [Driver 2 description] +$X,XXX
|--[-] [Driver 3 description] -$X,XXX
|--[+] [Driver 4 description] +$X,XXX
|--[-] [Driver 5 description] -$X,XXX
|
[Period 1 Actual] $XX,XXX
Variance Reconciliation:
Driver 1: +$X,XXX (XX% of total variance)
Driver 2: +$X,XXX (XX% of total variance)
Driver 3: -$X,XXX (XX% of total variance)
Driver 4: +$X,XXX (XX% of total variance)
Driver 5: -$X,XXX (XX% of total variance)
Unexplained: $X,XXX (XX% of total variance)
--------
Total: $X,XXX (100%)For each significant driver, generate a narrative explanation:
[Driver name] — [Favorable/Unfavorable] variance of $X,XXX (X.X%)
>
[2-3 sentence explanation of what caused this variance, referencing specific operational factors, business events, or decisions. Include quantification where possible.]
>
_Outlook:_ [Whether this is expected to continue, reverse, or change in future periods]
If the decomposition does not fully explain the total variance, flag the residual:
Unexplained variance: $X,XXX (X.X% of total)
>
Possible causes to investigate:
>
- [Suggested area 1] - [Suggested area 2] - [Suggested area 3]
Ask the user for additional context on unexplained variances:
Provide:
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.