Closeread Verify — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited Closeread Verify (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
A verified dependency-audit verdict any AI agent can call.
<!-- mcp-name: io.github.FreeGuy-AI/closeread-verify -->
A free scanner gives you raw CVEs. closeread-verify gives you the judgment: the verdict checked against the version you actually installed, the one finding that matters, and the exact fix. It runs as an MCP server, so any agent (Claude Code, Cursor, your own) can call it before it ships code and get back a checked answer, not a wall of noise.
npm auditA raw scanner and the agent itself can already produce a list of CVEs. What they cannot manufacture is the verdict. closeread-verify is built around the one discipline that separates a real audit from a scan:
^4.17.0 in amanifest is not what you shipped. The tool resolves the real pinned version from your lockfile and checks that, so it does not cry wolf over a caret range you already patched, and does not miss a vulnerable pin a manifest-only scan would wave through.
to bump) is separated from the one you inherited five levels down. Most scanners flatten these into one undifferentiated list. This one tells you which is which.
single lead: the highest-severity direct production issue, with the exact fix. If the only findings are transitive or dev-only, the lead is honestly null rather than a manufactured headline.
same verdict out. Advisories are confirmed against OSV.dev. The verdict carries its own basis so a reviewer can re-run it.
That verified artifact, not the raw scan, is the product.
pip install closeread-verifyPython 3.11+. No API key, no account, no source access. Lockfile in, verdict out.
examples/agent_loop.py is a runnable agent that uses closeread-verify as a pre-ship gate: it blocks on a real Flask CVE, applies the named fix, re-checks, and ships. Real MCP over stdio, real OSV advisories, no API key.
python examples/agent_loop.pycloseread-verify is the stdio command that starts the server:
closeread-verifyAdd it to your MCP client. Claude Code / Cursor style (mcp.json / claude_desktop_config.json):
{
"mcpServers": {
"closeread-verify": {
"command": "closeread-verify"
}
}
}If you installed into a specific environment, point at that interpreter instead:
{
"mcpServers": {
"closeread-verify": {
"command": "python",
"args": ["-m", "closeread.mcp_server"]
}
}
}| Tool | Input | Use it when |
|---|---|---|
audit_project | files: a {filename: content} map | You have a real checkout. Pass the manifest and its lockfile together (e.g. package.json + package-lock.json) so the direct-vs-transitive split is recovered. Subdir prefixes like server/package.json are allowed. |
audit_dependencies | lockfile_content: str, filename: str | You have a single manifest or lockfile and want a one-shot verdict. |
audit_repo | github_url: str | You have a public repo URL. It shallow-clones and runs the same audit. Returns an error, never a fabricated result, if the clone fails. |
The filename is load-bearing: it routes the content to the right ecosystem parser. Supported lockfiles include package-lock.json, yarn.lock, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, Pipfile.lock, Gemfile.lock, composer.lock, and Cargo.lock.
Calling audit_dependencies on a requirements.txt that pins flask==0.12.0:
{
"source": "lockfile:requirements.txt",
"lead": {
"summary": "[email protected] affected by GHSA-562c-5r94-xh97",
"severity": "high",
"is_direct": true,
"dependency_kind": "prod",
"location": "requirements.txt:1",
"fix": "Update flask to a patched version (see references).",
"confidence": 0.9
},
"findings": {
"issues": [],
"direct": [
{
"kind": "dependency",
"package": "flask",
"severity": "high",
"is_direct": true,
"versions": ["0.12.0"],
"advisories": ["GHSA-562c-5r94-xh97", "GHSA-5wv5-4vpf-pj6m", "GHSA-m2qf-hxjv-5gpq"],
"locations": ["requirements.txt:1"],
"recommendation": "Update flask to a patched version (see references)."
}
],
"transitive": []
},
"counts": { "product_critical": 3, "issues": 0, "direct": 1, "transitive": 0 },
"verification": {
"basis": "each version is the INSTALLED version resolved from the lockfile, not the declared floor; advisories confirmed via OSV; result is deterministic and re-checkable",
"scanner": "closeread SCA (deterministic, no LLM)",
"advisory_source": "OSV.dev",
"as_of": "2026-06-08T12:00:00+00:00"
}
}The agent does not get a scan to interpret. It gets a verdict to act on: bump flask, here is the line, here is why.
Agents are starting to write, review, and ship code on their own. Before an agent opens a PR or green-lights a deploy, it needs an answer to a simple question with a checkable answer: is anything I depend on known-vulnerable, in the version I actually pinned, and is it mine to fix? closeread-verify is that primitive. One MCP call, a deterministic verdict, no LLM in the loop to hallucinate a CVE that does not exist or miss one that does.
(Composer), crates.io (Cargo).
or transmit your source code.
not a full code review, not a SAST engine, not a license or architecture audit. It does one thing: a verified verdict on your dependencies.
MIT. Built by Free Guy.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.