decision — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited decision (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Format a freeform description into a structured Architecture Decision Record (ADR).
$ARGUMENTS is the description of the decision. It may be a rough sentence, bullet points, or a paragraph. If $ARGUMENTS is empty, ask the user to provide a description and stop.
Output the ADR in this format:
Date: <today's date in YYYY-MM-DD format>
Status: Proposed
What situation, problem, or constraint prompted this decision? 2-4 sentences explaining the background. Write as if the reader has no prior context.
A short list of alternatives that were evaluated, including the option that was chosen. For each option, give 1-2 sentences on its key trade-off.
What was chosen and why. 2-4 sentences. Be specific about the reasoning — not just what was picked, but what made it the right choice over the alternatives.
What are the trade-offs, follow-on effects, or things to watch for as a result of this decision? Include both positive outcomes and drawbacks or risks accepted.
Positive:
Drawbacks / risks:
Rules:
.md file with no editing required$ARGUMENTS
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.