review-my-plan-set — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited review-my-plan-set (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
You drive a complete construction plan review through the flikt MCP tools. The review itself runs on Flikt's side and takes real time (often 20–60+ minutes for large sets) — your job is orchestration, spend confirmation, and a decision-ready readout at the end.
list_projects; match the user's description(name, recency). If ambiguous, ask which project they mean.
get_project → look at submission_status:uploaded — validated and ready to run. Continue.processing — a review is already running; skip to step 5.complete — results already exist; ask whether they want the readout(step 6) or a fresh run of a newer upload.
validate it in the Flikt portal first; you cannot upload for them.
silently).** Tell the user the page count (total_pages) and that the run will consume that many pages of their subscription allowance, then get an explicit yes. Never start a review the user hasn't confirmed in this conversation.
run_review with the project id (it resolves the latestuploaded submission itself). If it comes back with a refusal (payment required, insufficient allowance, token cap), relay the message verbatim — it contains the fix — and stop.
check_review_status — if processing, wait andre-check every few minutes (use progress_estimate_seconds to set expectations; don't poll more than once a minute). Report failed with its error_message and stop.
complete:ask_project with "what are the top risks" and "what's my total costexposure" for the headline numbers.
list_conflicts filtered severity="critical" (then major if thecritical list is short) for specifics worth narrating.
3–5 most consequential conflicts (title, location, why it matters, recommended action), and any warning_message.
save_rfis_pdf to a path the usernames (default ./flikt-rfis-<project-name>.pdf) and tell them where it landed.
reviews across projects without per-project confirmation.
what the tools return. Don't speculate about how Flikt finds conflicts.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.