Is web-performance-optimization safe to install?

SaferSkills independently audited web-performance-optimization (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.

CategoryWeightCategory scoreContribution

Securityprompt, exec, net, exfil, eval

35%

100

35.0 pts

Supply chainhash, typosquat, maintainer, lockfile

20%

100

20.0 pts

Maintenancestaleness, pinning, CI

15%

100

15.0 pts

TransparencySKILL.md, perms, README

15%

100

15.0 pts

Communityinstalls, verify, response

15%

100

15.0 pts

Findings & checks · 0 flagged

Securityscore 100 · 0 findings

✓—All security checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass

Supply chainscore 100 · 0 findings

✓—All supply chain checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass

Maintenancescore 100 · 0 findings

✓—All maintenance checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass

Transparencyscore 100 · 0 findings

✓—All transparency checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass

Communityscore 100 · 0 findings

✓—All community checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass

The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.

plugins/web-performance-skills/skills/web-performance-optimization/SKILL.md · 1 file

plugins/web-performance-skills/skills/web-performance-optimization/SKILL.md8.0 KB · Markdown

name: web-performance-optimization

description: Analyzes web performance using Chrome DevTools MCP. Measures Core Web Vitals (FCP, LCP, TBT, CLS, Speed Index), identifies render-blocking resources, network dependency chains, layout shifts, caching issues, and accessibility gaps. Use when asked to audit, profile, debug, or optimize page load performance, Lighthouse scores, or site speed. Biases towards retrieval from current documentation over pre-trained knowledge.

license: Apache-2.0

Web Performance Audit

Your knowledge of web performance metrics, thresholds, and tooling APIs may be outdated. Prefer retrieval over pre-training when citing specific numbers or recommendations.

Retrieval Sources

Source	How to retrieve	Use for
web.dev	`https://web.dev/articles/vitals`	Core Web Vitals thresholds, definitions
Chrome DevTools docs	`https://developer.chrome.com/docs/devtools/performance`	Tooling APIs, trace analysis
Lighthouse scoring	`https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/performance-scoring`	Score weights, metric thresholds

FIRST: Verify MCP Tools Available

Run this before starting. Try calling navigate_page or performance_start_trace. If unavailable, STOP—the chrome-devtools MCP server isn't configured.

Ask the user to add this to their MCP config:

"chrome-devtools": {
  "type": "local",
  "command": ["npx", "-y", "chrome-devtools-mcp@latest"]
}

Key Guidelines

Be assertive: Verify claims by checking network requests, DOM, or codebase—then state findings definitively.
Verify before recommending: Confirm something is unused before suggesting removal.
Quantify impact: Use estimated savings from insights. Don't prioritize changes with 0ms impact.
Skip non-issues: If render-blocking resources have 0ms estimated impact, note but don't recommend action.
Be specific: Say "compress hero.png (450KB) to WebP" not "optimize images".
Prioritize ruthlessly: A site with 200ms LCP and 0 CLS is already excellent—say so.

Quick Reference

Task	Tool Call
Load page	`navigate_page(url: "...")`
Start trace	`performance_start_trace(autoStop: true, reload: true)`
Analyze insight	`performance_analyze_insight(insightSetId: "...", insightName: "...")`
List requests	`list_network_requests(resourceTypes: ["Script", "Stylesheet", ...])`
Request details	`get_network_request(reqid: <id>)`
A11y snapshot	`take_snapshot(verbose: true)`

Workflow

Copy this checklist to track progress:

Audit Progress:
- [ ] Phase 1: Performance trace (navigate + record)
- [ ] Phase 2: Core Web Vitals analysis (includes CLS culprits)
- [ ] Phase 3: Network analysis
- [ ] Phase 4: Accessibility snapshot
- [ ] Phase 5: Codebase analysis (skip if third-party site)

Phase 1: Performance Trace

Navigate to the target URL:

   navigate_page(url: "<target-url>")

Start a performance trace with reload to capture cold-load metrics:

   performance_start_trace(autoStop: true, reload: true)

Wait for trace completion, then retrieve results.

Troubleshooting:

If trace returns empty or fails, verify the page loaded correctly with navigate_page first
If insight names don't match, inspect the trace response to list available insights

Phase 2: Core Web Vitals Analysis

Use performance_analyze_insight to extract key metrics.

Note: Insight names may vary across Chrome DevTools versions. If an insight name doesn't work, check the insightSetId from the trace response to discover available insights.

Common insight names:

Metric	Insight Name	What to Look For
LCP	`LCPBreakdown`	Time to largest contentful paint; breakdown of TTFB, resource load, render delay
CLS	`CLSCulprits`	Elements causing layout shifts (images without dimensions, injected content, font swaps)
Render Blocking	`RenderBlocking`	CSS/JS blocking first paint
Document Latency	`DocumentLatency`	Server response time issues
Network Dependencies	`NetworkRequestsDepGraph`	Request chains delaying critical resources

Example:

performance_analyze_insight(insightSetId: "<id-from-trace>", insightName: "LCPBreakdown")

Key thresholds (good/needs-improvement/poor):

TTFB: < 800ms / < 1.8s / > 1.8s
FCP: < 1.8s / < 3s / > 3s
LCP: < 2.5s / < 4s / > 4s
INP: < 200ms / < 500ms / > 500ms
TBT: < 200ms / < 600ms / > 600ms
CLS: < 0.1 / < 0.25 / > 0.25
Speed Index: < 3.4s / < 5.8s / > 5.8s

Phase 3: Network Analysis

List all network requests to identify optimization opportunities:

list_network_requests(resourceTypes: ["Script", "Stylesheet", "Document", "Font", "Image"])

Look for:

Render-blocking resources: JS/CSS in <head> without async/defer/media attributes
Network chains: Resources discovered late because they depend on other resources loading first (e.g., CSS imports, JS-loaded fonts)
Missing preloads: Critical resources (fonts, hero images, key scripts) not preloaded
Caching issues: Missing or weak Cache-Control, ETag, or Last-Modified headers
Large payloads: Uncompressed or oversized JS/CSS bundles
Unused preconnects: If flagged, verify by checking if ANY requests went to that origin. If zero requests, it's definitively unused—recommend removal. If requests exist but loaded late, the preconnect may still be valuable.

For detailed request info:

get_network_request(reqid: <id>)

Phase 4: Accessibility Snapshot

Take an accessibility tree snapshot:

take_snapshot(verbose: true)

Flag high-level gaps:

Missing or duplicate ARIA IDs
Elements with poor contrast ratios (check against WCAG AA: 4.5:1 for normal text, 3:1 for large text)
Focus traps or missing focus indicators
Interactive elements without accessible names

Phase 5: Codebase Analysis

Skip if auditing a third-party site without codebase access.

Analyze the codebase to understand where improvements can be made.

Detect Framework & Bundler

Search for configuration files to identify the stack:

Tool	Config Files
Webpack	`webpack.config.js`, `webpack.*.js`
Vite	`vite.config.js`, `vite.config.ts`
Rollup	`rollup.config.js`, `rollup.config.mjs`
esbuild	`esbuild.config.js`, build scripts with `esbuild`
Parcel	`.parcelrc`, `package.json` (parcel field)
Next.js	`next.config.js`, `next.config.mjs`
Nuxt	`nuxt.config.js`, `nuxt.config.ts`
SvelteKit	`svelte.config.js`
Astro	`astro.config.mjs`

Also check package.json for framework dependencies and build scripts.

Tree-Shaking & Dead Code

Webpack: Check for mode: 'production', sideEffects in package.json, usedExports optimization
Vite/Rollup: Tree-shaking enabled by default; check for treeshake options
Look for: Barrel files (index.js re-exports), large utility libraries imported wholesale (lodash, moment)

Unused JS/CSS

Check for CSS-in-JS vs. static CSS extraction
Look for PurgeCSS/UnCSS configuration (Tailwind's content config)
Identify dynamic imports vs. eager loading

Polyfills

Check for @babel/preset-env targets and useBuiltIns setting
Look for core-js imports (often oversized)
Check browserslist config for overly broad targeting

Compression & Minification

Check for terser, esbuild, or swc minification
Look for gzip/brotli compression in build output or server config
Check for source maps in production builds (should be external or disabled)

Output Format

Present findings as:

Core Web Vitals Summary - Table with metric, value, and rating (good/needs-improvement/poor)
Top Issues - Prioritized list of problems with estimated impact (high/medium/low)
Recommendations - Specific, actionable fixes with code snippets or config changes
Codebase Findings - Framework/bundler detected, optimization opportunities (omit if no codebase access)

web-performance-optimization— agent skill

Is web-performance-optimization safe to install?

Web Performance Audit

Retrieval Sources

FIRST: Verify MCP Tools Available

Key Guidelines

Quick Reference

Workflow

Phase 1: Performance Trace

Phase 2: Core Web Vitals Analysis

Phase 3: Network Analysis

Phase 4: Accessibility Snapshot

Phase 5: Codebase Analysis

Detect Framework & Bundler

Tree-Shaking & Dead Code

Unused JS/CSS

Polyfills

Compression & Minification

Output Format

Audit the pieces. Scan the whole. Decide.