swiftdata-code-review — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited swiftdata-code-review (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
| Issue Type | Reference |
|---|---|
| @Model, @Attribute, @Relationship, delete rules | references/model-design.md |
| @Query, #Predicate, FetchDescriptor, #Index | references/queries.md |
| @ModelActor, ModelContext, background operations | references/concurrency.md |
| VersionedSchema, MigrationStage, lightweight/custom | references/migrations.md |
Run in order; do not assert an issue until the gate for that issue passes.
.swift path(s) and confirmed SwiftData surface in scope (e.g. import SwiftData, @Model, @Query, @ModelActor, VersionedSchema, or migration types). If none apply, stop or narrow scope with one sentence.references/*.md from the Quick Reference table or wrote N/A: no <area> in this review with a one-line reason.[FILE:LINE] ISSUE_TITLE header (line range allowed) from the file you read; no finding without a cite.[FILE:LINE] ISSUE_TITLE, then severity or checklist grouping—no uncited assertions.final (subclassing crashes)append(contentsOf:))~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.