pytest-code-review — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited pytest-code-review (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
| Issue Type | Reference |
|---|---|
| async def test_*, AsyncMock, await patterns | references/async-testing.md |
| conftest.py, factory fixtures, scope, cleanup | references/fixtures.md |
| @pytest.mark.parametrize, DRY patterns | references/parametrize.md |
| AsyncMock tracking, patch patterns, when to mock | references/mocking.md |
Work in order. Do not assert pytest-specific problems until each applicable gate passes.
test_*.py and any conftest.py you will cite; no findings for files outside that list.async def test_* / await; if yes, open references/async-testing.md before criticizing async usage.conftest.py path(s) or state none; for yield fixtures, confirm cleanup exists before claiming resource leaks.patch or mock critique, you give the import path where the symbol is used (call site), or mark N/A; open references/mocking.md when mocking is central to the review.async def test_* for async code under test~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.