elixir-performance-review — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited elixir-performance-review (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
| Issue Type | Reference |
|---|---|
| Mailbox overflow, blocking calls | references/genserver-bottlenecks.md |
| When to use ETS, read/write concurrency | references/ets-patterns.md |
| Binary handling, large messages | references/memory.md |
| Task patterns, flow control | references/concurrency.md |
| Issue | Flag ONLY IF |
|---|---|
| GenServer bottleneck | Handles > 1000 req/sec OR blocking I/O in callbacks |
| Use streams | Processing > 10k items OR reading large files |
| Use ETS | Read:write ratio > 10:1 AND concurrent access |
Do these in order for the performance review. Do not publish findings until each step passes.
path:line (or line range), or Module.function/arity plus a short quoted snippet from the file.grep/search scope)—otherwise downgrade to question / suspected with what was not verified.Complete Gates — before reporting (section above) first; the verification protocol is mandatory input to those gates.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.