academic-pptx — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited academic-pptx (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Source. This skill is adapted from Gabberflast/academic-pptx-skill. The SKILL.md, content_guidelines.md, and slide_patterns.md supporting files are derived from Gabberflast's originals; this fork retains the "Structured Argument" mode, ghost-deck test, action titles, and communication-first design unchanged, and adapts the trigger surface for quantitative-marketing audiences (MKSCI / JMR / JCR / MS seminars, MBA teaching, grant briefings).This skill has two layers:
Always read both before writing any code or creating any files.
| Task | Guide |
|---|---|
| Content planning, argument structure, slide-by-slide rules | content_guidelines.md |
| Per-slide-type patterns (title, methods, results, etc.) | slide_patterns.md |
| Technical creation from scratch | PPTX skill → pptxgenjs.md |
| Technical editing of an existing file | PPTX skill → editing.md |
Before planning a single slide, determine which mode applies.
Use for: conference papers, seminar talks, thesis defenses, dissertation chapters, grant briefings, internal lab presentations, policy briefings, consulting-style research deliverables.
Priority order: argument structure → data → layout → aesthetics.
Follow content_guidelines.md in full.
Use for: public engagement talks, science communication to non-specialist audiences, funding pitches to lay panels, event keynotes.
Follow the PPTX skill's design-forward guidelines. Argument structure still matters, but visual storytelling and emotional engagement take priority.
Default to Structured Argument. If the user mentions a paper, a study, a dataset, a thesis, a grant, or a conference, they almost certainly want structured argument mode.
Produce a slide-by-slide outline (title, action title, exhibit type) and confirm with the user if the deck is more than 10 slides or if the content is complex. Do not start building until the outline is agreed.
Use the ghost deck test during planning: read only the proposed action titles in sequence. They must tell the complete argument. If they don't, fix the outline before building.
Academic presentations use communication-first design. These rules override the PPTX skill's design-forward defaults.
1F4E79), mid-blue accent (2E75B6), white or off-white background.| Element | Size | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Action title | 24–28 pt | Bold |
| Section header | 20–22 pt | Bold |
| Body bullets | 20 pt | Regular |
| Chart labels / annotations | 16–18 pt | Regular |
| Source citations on slides | 12–14 pt | Regular, muted color |
Single font face. Use size and weight for hierarchy — never multiple typefaces.
Follow the PPTX skill's QA procedure in full, including:
markitdownAdditionally, run the academic-specific checks:
Academic QA checklist:
□ Every content slide has an action title (complete sentence stating the takeaway)
□ Ghost deck test passes (action titles alone tell the full argument)
□ One exhibit per results slide; each exhibit has a "so what" annotation
□ Every borrowed figure or data point has an in-slide citation
□ A References slide exists at the end
□ Conclusions slide is the last non-appendix slide (not "Thank You" or a blank)
□ Contact information and/or QR code/link on the final slide
□ Font sizes are readable from the back of a room (≥ 20 pt body text)
□ No decorative elements that don't carry content
□ Section dividers or breadcrumb bar present for decks > 15 slidesAction titles, not topic labels. Every slide title is a complete sentence stating the takeaway. Reading titles alone should tell the whole argument (ghost deck test).
One argument, made well. Don't present your whole paper. Pick the claim that can be made convincingly in the allotted time. Everything else goes in the appendix.
One insight per slide. One exhibit per results slide. Highlight the key finding directly on the chart — don't make the audience hunt for it.
Slides support speech; they don't replace it. Body text is for orientation, not information transfer. The presenter carries the argument; the slide carries the evidence.
Cite everything borrowed. Academic integrity applies to slides. In-text citations on the slide, full references on the References slide.
End on conclusions. The conclusions slide stays on screen during Q&A. Never end on "Thank You" or a blank slide.
Same as PPTX skill:
pip install "markitdown[pptx]" — text extractionnpm install -g pptxgenjs — creating from scratchsoffice) — PDF conversionpdftoppm) — PDF to images~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.