cds-review — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited cds-review (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
<objective> Invoke external AI CLIs (Gemini, Claude, Codex, OpenCode, Qwen Code, Cursor) to independently review phase plans. Produces a structured REVIEWS.md with per-reviewer feedback that can be fed back into planning via /cds-plan-phase --reviews.
Flow: Detect CLIs → Build review prompt → Invoke each CLI → Collect responses → Write REVIEWS.md </objective>
<execution_context> @$HOME/.claude/cds-workflow/workflows/review.md </execution_context>
<context> Phase number: extracted from $ARGUMENTS (required)
Flags:
--gemini — Include Gemini CLI review--claude — Include Claude CLI review (uses separate session)--codex — Include Codex CLI review--opencode — Include OpenCode review (uses model from user's OpenCode config)--qwen — Include Qwen Code review (Alibaba Qwen models)--cursor — Include Cursor agent review--all — Include all available CLIs</context>
<process> Execute the review workflow from @$HOME/.claude/cds-workflow/workflows/review.md end-to-end. </process>
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.