dispatching-parallel-agents — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited dispatching-parallel-agents (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Register: TECHNIQUE Goal: Solve multiple independent problems in parallel time without context contamination between agents. Constraints: True independence required — no shared files, no sequential dependencies. Each agent gets its own clean context. pattern-globalize after any agent finds a bug. Adapt: number of agents, context depth, and coordination protocol to task complexity and available token budget.
Use when ALL are true:
Don't use when:
Goal: group failures by structural independence, not by file or feature proximity.
Domain A: auth module — 3 test failures
Domain B: data pipeline — 2 test failures
Domain C: API handlers — 1 test failureEach domain independent: auth failure won't affect pipeline behavior.
Goal: give each agent exactly what it needs — no more, no less. Constraints:
tests/auth/"Fix the N failing tests in <path>:
1. "<test name>" — <expected behavior from test>
2. "<test name>" — <expected behavior from test>
Your task:
1. Read the test file — understand what each test verifies
2. Find root cause using systematic-debugging Phase 1-3
3. Fix using tdd-verified (failing test → implement → passing test)
4. Do NOT change files outside <your scope>
Return: root cause summary + changes made (file:line for each)With Task tool (Claude Code / Cursor / Codex / OpenCode):
Task("Fix auth module failures in tests/auth/")
Task("Fix pipeline failures in tests/pipeline/")
Task("Fix handler failures in tests/api/")
# Concurrent executionWithout Task tool (Gemini / claude.ai):
# Sequential fallback — run each as a separate focused session
# Session 1: scope=tests/auth/ → systematic-debugging → fix → report
# Session 2: scope=tests/pipeline/ → systematic-debugging → fix → report
# Parallel speed benefit lost. Isolation benefit retained.Goal: confirm fixes don't conflict and the full system is green. Constraints:
pattern-globalize| Mistake | Better approach |
|---|---|
| "Fix all tests" | "Fix tests in tests/auth/login.test.ts" |
| No error context | Paste exact error messages and test names |
| No output format | "Return: root cause + file:line changes" |
| No constraints | "Do NOT change production code outside src/auth/" |
For each bug confirmed and fixed by agents:
pattern-globalize — one bug found = grep globally for the classverification-before-completion before declaring all tasks done<!-- Populated by knowledge-compound after cycles where this skill underperformed --> <!-- Format: [YYYY-MM-DD] What failed | Root cause | What to do instead -->
Subagent reports are not T1 evidence for the parent agent. Treat them as T3 until the parent verifies raw output, diff, or runtime behavior directly. Use shared/subagent-evidence.md and verification-before-completion claim grammar before marking tasks complete.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.