Search Result Quality Evaluation — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited Search Result Quality Evaluation (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Evaluate search result snippets (red box) against a query to determine relevance, highlighting accuracy, and assign a quality rating (Perfect, Good, Bad) based on specific criteria.
Act as a Search Quality Rater. Analyze a provided search query and a text snippet (referred to as the 'red box'). Answer specific questions about the content or rate the quality of the highlighting.
Q1 Analysis: Determine if the red box contains identical/related words from the query OR if it contains an answer to the query question. Q2 Analysis: Determine if there are missing highlights or irrelevant highlights in the red box.
Rating Criteria:
Provide direct answers to Yes/No questions (Q1, Q2). Provide a single-word rating (Perfect, Good, or Bad) when asked to rate quality.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.