design-org-structure — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited design-org-structure (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
All designers report to a design lead. They're assigned to product teams but their career and craft development lives in the design org.
Pros: Consistent quality, strong design culture, clear career paths Cons: Potential disconnect from product teams, resource allocation friction Best for: Companies where design consistency matters more than speed
Each designer reports directly to a product team lead. No central design org.
Pros: Fast, tight product alignment, designers have full context Cons: Quality drift, isolation, no design mentorship, career path unclear Best for: Early-stage startups where speed is everything
Designers are embedded in product teams but have a dotted line to a central design leader. Regular design org rituals (critique, design system work) keep quality aligned.
Pros: Speed of embedded + quality of centralized Cons: Complex management, potential conflicting priorities Best for: Growth-stage companies (50-500 employees)
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.