design-economics — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited design-economics (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
"Design is valuable" isn't an argument. "Design reduced support tickets by 30%, saving $240K/year" is.
Cost of the problem (current state)
- Cost of the solution (design investment)
= Net value of designCurrent state: 40% onboarding drop-off
Users lost/month: 2,000
Average LTV: $120
Monthly revenue loss: $240,000
Design investment: 2 designers x 6 weeks = ~$50,000
Target: reduce drop-off to 25% (conservative)
Users saved/month: 750
Monthly revenue recovered: $90,000
Payback period: < 1 month
Annual ROI: 2,060%"Design is subjective" Response: Usability isn't. Task completion rate isn't. Conversion rate isn't. We can measure whether design achieves its goals objectively.
"We can't afford to invest in design right now" Response: Show the cost of NOT investing. Support tickets, churn, lost conversions.
"Can't we just use a template?" Response: Templates solve the obvious 80%. The remaining 20% is where users struggle, leave, and generate support tickets. That 20% is the design work.
"How do we know it was the design that made the difference?" Response: A/B testing isolates design changes. Before/after measurement with controlled variables. We can't claim 100% attribution, but we can demonstrate strong correlation.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.