Is doncheli-debate-64d0e4 safe to install?

SaferSkills independently audited doncheli-debate-64d0e4 (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.

CategoryWeightCategory scoreContribution

Securityprompt, exec, net, exfil, eval

35%

100

35.0 pts

Supply chainhash, typosquat, maintainer, lockfile

20%

100

20.0 pts

Maintenancestaleness, pinning, CI

15%

100

15.0 pts

TransparencySKILL.md, perms, README

15%

100

15.0 pts

Communityinstalls, verify, response

15%

100

15.0 pts

Findings & checks · 0 flagged

Securityscore 100 · 0 findings

✓—All security checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass

Supply chainscore 100 · 0 findings

✓—All supply chain checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass

Maintenancescore 100 · 0 findings

✓—All maintenance checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass

Transparencyscore 100 · 0 findings

✓—All transparency checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass

Communityscore 100 · 0 findings

✓—All community checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass

The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.

.opencode/skills/doncheli-debate/SKILL.md · 1 file

.opencode/skills/doncheli-debate/SKILL.md2.1 KB · Markdown

name: doncheli-debate

description: Run an adversarial multi-role debate to surface trade-offs and reach a reasoned decision. Activate when user mentions "debate", "discuss", "trade-off", "decision", "compare options", "pros and cons", "choose between".

Don Cheli: Adversarial Debate Panel

Roles

Each role is played by a separate internal agent with its own agenda:

Role	Primary Concern
CPO	User value, market fit, time-to-market
Architect	Scalability, maintainability, tech debt
QA Lead	Reliability, testability, edge cases
UX Lead	Usability, accessibility, consistency
Business	Cost, ROI, risk, compliance

Instructions

Read the decision or proposal to evaluate
Each role presents its position (2–4 bullets) — what it likes and what it fears
Each role MUST identify at least one concrete problem with every other role's proposal (no free passes)
After all attacks, each role proposes one mitigation or compromise
Synthesize tensions and produce a decision with explicit trade-offs accepted

Output Format

## Debate: <topic>

### Round 1 — Positions
**CPO:** …
**Architect:** …
**QA Lead:** …
**UX Lead:** …
**Business:** …

### Round 2 — Attacks (each role vs. others)
**CPO → Architect:** …
**Architect → CPO:** …
… (all cross-attacks)

### Round 3 — Mitigations
**CPO proposes:** …
… (one per role)

### Decision
**Chosen approach:** …
**Trade-offs accepted:** …
**Conditions / guardrails:** …

Quality Gate

No role may agree unconditionally with another — every role must raise at least one concern
The Decision section must name at least two trade-offs explicitly accepted
If consensus is impossible, output "DEADLOCK" and list the 2–3 unresolved tensions for human escalation

Do not use this skill when

The decision is already made and the user only wants implementation help
The question has a single objectively correct answer (use doncheli-reasoning instead)

doncheli-debate-64d0e4— agent skill

Is doncheli-debate-64d0e4 safe to install?

Don Cheli: Adversarial Debate Panel

Roles

Instructions

Output Format

Quality Gate

Do not use this skill when

Audit the pieces. Scan the whole. Decide.