competitive-battlecard — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited competitive-battlecard (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Create a concise, sales-ready battlecard for use against a specific competitor.
You are creating a competitive battlecard for $ARGUMENTS.
Use web search to research the competitor's current product, pricing, positioning, and recent changes. If the user provides files (feature lists, win/loss data, sales call notes), read them first.
| Capability | Us | Them | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Feature area 1] | [Our approach] | [Their approach] | [Us/Them/Tie] |
| [Feature area 2] | ... | ... | ... |
| Pricing | ... | ... | ... |
| Support | ... | ... | ... |
| Prospect Says | Respond With |
|---|---|
| "Competitor X has [feature]" | "[Our alternative approach and why it's better for them]" |
| "They're cheaper" | "[Value framing: total cost of ownership, ROI, hidden costs]" |
| "They're more established" | "[Our advantages: speed, innovation, focus, support]" |
Questions to ask the prospect that highlight competitor weaknesses:
Save as markdown. Format for easy printing or sharing in Notion/Confluence.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.