audit-qc — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited audit-qc (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Does this meet standards?
# Check formatting
npm run lint
npm run format
# Check for console.log
grep -rn "console.log" . --include="*.js"| Check | Issue | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| Lint errors | HIGH | Fail |
| console.log in prod | LOW | Warn |
| No tests | MEDIUM | Warn |
# Type errors
npm run type-check
npx tsc --noEmit| Check | Issue | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| Type error | HIGH | Fail |
| Any type | LOW | Warn |
# Test coverage
npm test
npm run test:coverage| Check | Issue | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| Tests fail | HIGH | Fail |
| <80% coverage | MEDIUM | Warn |
| No tests | LOW | Warn |
# Does it build?
npm run build| Check | Issue | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| Build fails | HIGH | Fail |
| Build warning | LOW | Warn |
## QC Audit - [file]
### Lint
- [PASS/FAIL] Lint: [errors]
### Types
- [PASS/FAIL] Types: [errors]
### Tests
- [PASS/FAIL] Tests: [result]
- Coverage: [x]%
### Build
- [PASS/FAIL] Build: [result]
### Summary
| Check | Result |
|--------|---------|
| Lint | PASS |
| Types | PASS |
| Tests | PASS |
| Build | PASS || Level | Meaning |
|---|---|
| PASS | Ready to merge |
| WARN | Consider fixing |
| FAIL | Block merge |
Role: QC Auditor Input: Code to check Output: Standards met?
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.