incremental-coding — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited incremental-coding (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
The biggest risk in software development is building a lot of code that doesn't work. Incremental coding limits this risk: build a little, verify it works, build more. At every step, the system is in a known-good state.
Verify: The first increment can be verified in under 5 minutes.
Verify: There is a working commit after each increment.
Verify: By completion, all mocks replaced with real integration.
| Excuse | Rebuttal |
|---|---|
| "I need to build it all to know if it works" | No. Build the first piece and test it. Uncertainty is always reducible. |
| "Integration is at the end" | Integration pain is proportional to time since last integration. Integrate continuously. |
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.