gsd:spec-phase — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited gsd:spec-phase (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
<objective> Clarify phase requirements through structured Socratic questioning with quantitative ambiguity scoring.
Position in workflow: spec-phase → discuss-phase → plan-phase → execute-phase → verify
How it works:
Output: {phase_dir}/{padded_phase}-SPEC.md — falsifiable requirements that lock "what/why" before discuss-phase handles "how" </objective>
<execution_context> @${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/workflows/spec-phase.md @${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/spec.md </execution_context>
<runtime_note> Copilot (VS Code): Use vscode_askquestions wherever this workflow calls AskUserQuestion. They are equivalent. </runtime_note>
<context> Phase number: $ARGUMENTS (required)
Flags:
--auto — Skip interactive questions; Claude selects recommended defaults and writes SPEC.md--text — Use plain-text numbered lists instead of TUI menus (required for /rc remote sessions)Context files are resolved in-workflow using init phase-op. </context>
<process> Execute the spec-phase workflow from @${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/workflows/spec-phase.md end-to-end.
MANDATORY: Read the workflow file BEFORE taking any action. The workflow contains the complete step-by-step process including the Socratic interview loop, ambiguity scoring gate, and SPEC.md generation. Do not improvise from the objective summary above. </process>
<success_criteria>
</success_criteria>
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.