datarobot-model-explainability — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited datarobot-model-explainability (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
This skill covers SHAP insights, XEMP prediction explanations, anomaly explanations, and model diagnostics.
SDK version: Usedatarobot>=3.6.0for the full API set in this skill (ShapDistributionswas added in 3.6;ShapMatrix,ShapImpact, andShapPrevieware available indatarobot>=3.4.0). Usefrom datarobot.insights import ShapMatrix, ...withentity_id=model_id— not legacydatarobot.models.ShapMatrix(project_id/dataset_id).ShapMatrix,ShapImpact,ShapPreview, andShapDistributionsare the canonical SHAP API. The olderdr.PredictionExplanations(XEMP-based) remains available but is the secondary path.
| Goal | API to use | Prerequisites |
|---|---|---|
| SHAP values for all features, all rows | ShapMatrix.create(entity_id=model_id) | None - universal SHAP |
| Per-row top-feature explanations | ShapPreview.create(entity_id=model_id) | None |
| Aggregated feature importance via SHAP | ShapImpact.create(entity_id=model_id) | None |
| SHAP value distributions across features | ShapDistributions.create(entity_id=model_id) | None |
| SHAP for a filtered segment | dr.DataSlice.create(...) + ShapMatrix.create(..., data_slice_id=...) | Data slice definition |
| XEMP-based prediction explanations | dr.PredictionExplanations.create(...) | Feature Impact; PE initialization; dataset uploaded |
| Anomaly explanations (time series) | AnomalyAssessmentRecord.compute(project_id, model_id, ...) | Anomaly model |
| ROC / lift / confusion (insights) | RocCurve.create(...) / LiftChart.create(...) / ConfusionMatrix.create(...) | Validation data |
| ROC / lift / confusion (Model helpers) | model.get_roc_curve() / model.get_lift_chart() / model.get_confusion_chart() | Validation data |
Universal SHAP is the preferred path - no dataset pre-upload or Feature Impact step required.
Use this skill when you need to explain leaderboard model behavior, compute SHAP insights, use XEMP prediction explanations, analyze anomaly explanations, or retrieve model diagnostics.
ShapMatrix, ShapPreview, ShapImpact, and ShapDistributionsdr.DataSlicedr.PredictionExplanations when specifically requiredimport os
import datarobot as dr
from datarobot.insights import ShapMatrix, ShapImpact, ShapPreview, ShapDistributions
dr.Client(
token=os.environ["DATAROBOT_API_TOKEN"],
endpoint=os.environ.get("DATAROBOT_ENDPOINT", "https://app.datarobot.com/api/v2"),
)datarobot.insightsimport pandas as pd
from datarobot.insights import ShapMatrix, ShapImpact, ShapPreview, ShapDistributions
model_id = "YOUR_MODEL_ID"
matrix = ShapMatrix.create(entity_id=model_id)
df = pd.DataFrame(matrix.matrix, columns=matrix.columns)
impact = ShapImpact.create(entity_id=model_id)
preview = ShapPreview.create(entity_id=model_id)
distributions = ShapDistributions.create(entity_id=model_id)Use ShapMatrix for full row-by-feature SHAP values, ShapPreview for compact top-driver rows, ShapImpact for aggregated SHAP importance, and ShapDistributions for per-feature SHAP distributions. Use source="externalTestSet" plus external_dataset_id for external datasets. See references/shap_api_reference.md for parameters, exports, and limitations.
Use dr.PredictionExplanations when XEMP explanations are specifically required (e.g., certain regulatory contexts, or when SHAP is unavailable for the model type).
Prerequisites (all required before calling .create()):
model.request_feature_impact() and waitdr.PredictionExplanationsInitialization.create(...)import datarobot as dr
model = dr.Model.get(project=project_id, model_id=model_id)
model.request_feature_impact().wait_for_completion()
dr.PredictionExplanationsInitialization.create(project_id=project_id, model_id=model_id)
dataset = dr.Dataset.upload("./data/scoring_data.csv")
pe_job = dr.PredictionExplanations.create(
project_id=project_id,
model_id=model_id,
dataset_id=dataset.id,
max_explanations=5, # top N features per row, up to 50
threshold_high=0.5, # only explain rows with prediction >= threshold
threshold_low=0.1, # only explain rows with prediction <= threshold
)
pe_obj = pe_job.get_result_when_complete()Use pe_obj.get_rows(), pe_obj.get_all_as_dataframe(), or pe_obj.download_to_csv(...) to retrieve results. For parameters, multiclass modes, and exposure-adjusted predictions, see references/xemp_pe_reference.md.
Use dr.DataSlice when the user asks to explain model behavior for a segment, such as a region, product line, target class, or high-risk cohort. Pass the resulting data_slice_id into the datarobot.insights SHAP APIs.
import datarobot as dr
from datarobot.insights import ShapMatrix
data_slice = dr.DataSlice.create(
name="high_income_customers",
filters=[{"operand": "income", "operator": ">", "values": 100000}],
project=project_id,
)
shap_matrix = ShapMatrix.create(
entity_id=model_id,
source="validation",
data_slice_id=data_slice.id,
)For time series anomaly detection models, use AnomalyAssessmentRecord.
from datarobot.models.anomaly_assessment import AnomalyAssessmentRecord
record = AnomalyAssessmentRecord.compute(
project_id=project_id,
model_id=model_id,
backtest=0, # backtest index (int) or "holdout"
source="validation", # "training" or "validation" only
series_id=None, # required for multiseries projects
)
records = AnomalyAssessmentRecord.list(project_id=project_id, model_id=model_id)
latest = record.get_latest_explanations()
regions = record.get_predictions_preview().find_anomalous_regions()
explanations = record.get_explanations_data_in_regions(regions=regions)
ranged = record.get_explanations(
start_date="2024-01-01T00:00:00.000000Z",
end_date="2024-06-01T00:00:00.000000Z",
)Use the same entity_id=model_id pattern as SHAP insights. FeatureEffects / partial dependence is still retrieved through Model helpers (not in datarobot.insights).
from datarobot.insights import RocCurve, LiftChart, ConfusionMatrix
roc = RocCurve.create(entity_id=model_id)
lift = LiftChart.create(entity_id=model_id)
confusion = ConfusionMatrix.create(entity_id=model_id)model = dr.Model.get(project=project_id, model_id=model_id)
roc = model.get_roc_curve(source="validation")
lift = model.get_lift_chart(source="validation")
confusion = model.get_confusion_chart(source="validation")
# Feature Impact (non-SHAP) and Feature Effects (partial dependence for top features)
fi = model.get_feature_impact()
feature_effects = model.get_feature_effect(source="validation")prediction - base_value in the link-function spaceExample: if base_value = 0.35 and a row's prediction is 0.72, the row's SHAP values sum to 0.37 when link_function = "identity". A feature with SHAP +0.20 contributed 20 units in that same link-function space above baseline.
When link_function = "logit", SHAP values are in log-odds space. Add feature contributions to base_value in log-odds space, then use inverse-logit (scipy.special.expit) on the resulting total to convert it to a probability. Do not apply expit to individual SHAP values as if they were probability deltas.
Task: explain predictions
|
- Need all features + all rows? -> ShapMatrix.create(entity_id=model_id)
- Need top-N features per row? -> ShapPreview.create(entity_id=model_id)
- Need aggregated importance? -> ShapImpact.compute(entity_id=model_id)
- Need feature SHAP distributions? -> ShapDistributions.create(entity_id=model_id)
- Need a segment/cohort only? -> dr.DataSlice + data_slice_id
- XEMP required (regulatory/type)? -> dr.PredictionExplanations.create(...)
- Time series / anomaly model? -> AnomalyAssessmentRecord.compute(project_id, model_id, ...)| Error | Cause | Fix |
|---|---|---|
SHAP not available for this model | Unsupported model type, or anomaly-detection model with >1000 features | Check model support; use XEMP PE if SHAP is unavailable |
Feature Impact not computed | PredictionExplanations prerequisite missing | Run model.request_feature_impact() and wait |
Missing PredictionExplanationsInitialization | PE not initialized | Call PredictionExplanationsInitialization.create() |
source='holdout' fails | Holdout not unlocked | Unlock holdout in project settings first |
Empty previews | No rows in partition | Check partition contains data |
references/shap_api_reference.md - full parameter signatures for ShapMatrix, ShapImpact, ShapPreview, ShapDistributionsreferences/xemp_pe_reference.md - PredictionExplanations and PredictionExplanationsInitialization parameter referencescripts/compute_shap_matrix.py - compute and export ShapMatrix to CSV or DataFrame~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.