Forensic account research engine. Pulls earnings calls, filings, leadership changes, and compresses signal to a single Forcing Function.
SaferSkills independently audited gtm-account-intel (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
This skill takes a company name and produces three deliverables in a single pass:
It runs end-to-end without manual intervention. You type a company name. It produces send-ready output.
This skill works best with web search enabled. The account research phase uses live web data to pull current strategic priorities, earnings signals, job postings, and technology partnerships.
claude mcp list to check.If web search is not available: The skill will still run, but it will use training data instead of live research. The output will be less current and less specific. The methodology (buying committee mapping, persona-calibrated sequencing, forcing function identification) still applies, but the account intelligence will reflect what Claude knows from training rather than what's happening at the company right now. If you see generic or stale data in the output, that's a sign web search isn't connected.
Type any of:
research [company name]run account intel for [company name]give me a GTM plan for [company name]Optional parameters:
If no product context is given, the skill produces industry-agnostic intelligence and generic outbound messaging that demonstrates the framework without selling a specific product.
This skill encodes a three-phase GTM research methodology:
Objective: Build a forensic understanding of the company's current strategic position before writing a single word of outreach.
Research sequence (executed via web search):
Output format | Account Intelligence Brief:
## [COMPANY NAME] | Account Intelligence Brief
### Company Snapshot
- Industry: [specific vertical, not just "technology"]
- Size: [revenue / headcount / funding stage]
- HQ: [location]
- Growth signal: [expanding, contracting, or pivoting, with evidence]
### Primary Forcing Function
[One paragraph. The specific operational pressure driving urgency. Not a trend. The pressure. With source.]
### Strategic Priorities (Next 12 Months)
1. [Priority with evidence source]
2. [Priority with evidence source]
3. [Priority with evidence source]
### Technology Stack Signals
- [Signal with source: job postings, partnerships, announcements]
### Competitive Pressure
- [Who's threatening them and how]
### Key Insight for Outreach
[One sentence: the non-obvious finding that most salespeople would miss but that creates a genuine opening for conversation.]Objective: Identify the 5-tier buying committee structure for any significant technology or operational purchase at this company.
The 5-tier model:
| Tier | Role | What They Care About | How to Engage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Champion | Mid-to-senior operator who owns the pain daily | Operational relief, measurable improvement, looking smart to leadership | Peer-to-peer. Lead with their specific pain. Show you understand their day. |
| 2. Economic Buyer | CFO, VP Finance, VP Ops (controls budget) | ROI, payback period, cost avoidance, risk | Metrics-first. Lead with financial impact. Frame as cost relief, not innovation. |
| 3. Technical Gate | CTO, VP IT, Security, Legal | Integration risk, security, compliance, technical debt | Specification-level. Lead with architecture. Address risk before they raise it. |
| 4. Executive Sponsor | C-suite or SVP who validates strategic direction | Mission alignment, board-level narrative, competitive positioning | Strategic framing. Lead with market position. Connect to their public statements. |
| 5. Operational Pain | Directors/managers whose teams absorb the daily consequences | Workflow efficiency, staff burden, error reduction | Tactical empathy. Lead with "I know your team deals with [specific pain]." |
Research approach for committee mapping:
Output format | Buying Committee Map:
## Buying Committee Map | [COMPANY NAME]
### Recommended Entry Point
[Which tier and why. Usually Tier 1 or Tier 5, the people closest to the pain.]
### Committee Members
**Tier 1: Champion**
- Name: [if findable] | Title: [specific title]
- Why they matter: [one sentence]
- Engagement angle: [what to lead with]
**Tier 2: Economic Buyer**
[same format]
**Tier 3: Technical Gate**
[same format]
**Tier 4: Executive Sponsor**
[same format]
**Tier 5: Operational Pain**
[same format]
### Multi-Threading Strategy
[One paragraph: which tier to enter through, how to build internal momentum, and what sequence to engage the committee in.]Objective: Draft persona-calibrated outreach for the top 3 committee members, sequenced across three touchpoints.
Pre-writing requirements (complete silently before drafting):
For each contact, answer:
Messaging rules:
Sequence structure:
| Touch | Channel | Purpose | Timing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Touch 1 | Open the thread. One insight they didn't have. One question. | Day 1 | |
| Touch 2 | Reinforce with a different angle. Add social proof or a relevant resource. | Day 3 | |
| Touch 3 | Follow up with a new data point or perspective shift. Escalate the CTA slightly. | Day 7 |
Output format | 3-Touch Sequence:
## Outbound Sequence | [COMPANY NAME]
### Contact 1: [Name/Title] (Tier [X] | [Role])
**Touch 1 | Email (Day 1)**
Subject: [subject line]
[Body, 4-6 sentences max]
**Touch 2 | LinkedIn (Day 3)**
[Connection note or InMail, 3 sentences max]
**Touch 3 | Email (Day 7)**
Subject: [subject line, must be different from Touch 1]
[Body, 4-6 sentences max]
---
### Contact 2: [Name/Title] (Tier [X] | [Role])
[Same structure]
---
### Contact 3: [Name/Title] (Tier [X] | [Role])
[Same structure]Before delivering final output, verify:
Built by Dallas Andrews. This is a working demonstration of how AI-powered GTM operations actually functions. Not a chatbot that answers questions. A system that does the research, applies judgment, and produces send-ready output.
The full system includes 30+ interconnected skills covering account research, pipeline intelligence, competitive displacement, post-call processing, deal acceleration, and cross-functional enablement. Five departments adopted it without a mandate.
Portfolio and case studies: dallasandrews.dev
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.