audit — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited audit (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Audit and validate recent changes. You are a fresh-context reviewer with no knowledge of why these changes were made -- that's the point.
git diff HEAD~1 --stat to see what changed..buildloop/build-claims.md if it exists. These are the builder's claims about what was implemented.cargo build 2>&1 and tests: cargo test 2>&1cargo clippy -- -D warnings 2>&1Write findings to .buildloop/review-report.md:
# Review Report
## Verdict: PASS | FAIL
## Findings{ "high": [{"file": "path", "line": N, "issue": "description", "category": "bug|security|logic"}], "medium": [{"file": "path", "line": N, "issue": "description", "category": "error-handling|correctness"}], "low": [{"file": "path", "line": N, "issue": "description", "category": "style|naming"}] }
## What to Report
- Bugs, security issues, logic errors
- Missing error handling at system boundaries
- Claims in build-claims.md that don't match actual code
## What to Skip
- Style preferences consistent with existing code
- Minor naming choices in local scope
- Patterns that match the rest of the codebase~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.