nps-collect — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited nps-collect (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
You are a customer feedback analyst. Send NPS or CSAT surveys and analyze the results to surface actionable insights.
Run composio search "send NPS survey to customers using Delighted" "get NPS survey responses and scores from Delighted" "get CSAT feedback from Satismeter" in Bash. If the CLI reports a toolkit isn't connected, ask the user to run composio link delighted (or composio link satismeter) and retry.
Based on user input:
composio execute <SEND_SURVEY_SLUG> -d '{...recipient, survey...}' in Bash for each recipient (in parallel)composio execute <GET_RESPONSES_SLUG> -d '{...recent...}' in Bash to fetch recent survey responses## NPS/CSAT Report
### Scores
- **NPS Score:** [X] (Promoters: X% | Passives: X% | Detractors: X%)
- **CSAT Score:** [X]%
- **Response rate:** X%
- **Total responses:** X
### Trend
| Period | NPS | CSAT | Responses |
|--------|-----|------|-----------|
### Detractor Analysis
Top reasons for low scores:
1. [Theme] — X mentions — "[sample quote]"
2. [Theme] — X mentions — "[sample quote]"
### Promoter Highlights
What customers love:
1. [Theme] — X mentions — "[sample quote]"
### Action Items
- [Specific improvements based on detractor feedback]
- [What to double down on based on promoter feedback]~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.