codewiki-usage — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited codewiki-usage (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
| Tool | Tokens | Use When |
|---|---|---|
codewiki_read_structure | ~Low | First call — get the table of contents as JSON |
codewiki_list_topics | ~Medium | Need section titles + short previews to pick the right one |
codewiki_read_contents | ~High | Read full section content (supports pagination) |
codewiki_search_wiki | ~High | Ask Gemini a specific question about the repo |
codewiki_request_indexing | ~Minimal | Submit an unindexed repo for Google to process |
codewiki_read_structure(repo_url) to see what sections exist.codewiki_read_contents(repo_url, section_title=<title>) for each.codewiki_search_wiki for specific questions not covered by sections.offset and limit parameters in codewiki_read_contents to avoid pulling everything at once.codewiki_read_structure first.When any tool returns a NOT_INDEXED error:
codewiki_request_indexing(repo_url) to submit the request.When comparing two or more repositories:
[Section Title] from owner/repo.codewiki_search_wiki, note it was an AI-generated answer from CodeWiki.~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.