designing-tests — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited designing-tests (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Copy this checklist and track progress:
Test Implementation Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Identify what to test
- [ ] Step 2: Select appropriate test type
- [ ] Step 3: Write tests following templates
- [ ] Step 4: Run tests and verify passing
- [ ] Step 5: Check coverage meets targets
- [ ] Step 6: Fix any failing testsApply the testing pyramid for balanced coverage:
/\
/ \ E2E Tests (10%)
/----\ - Critical user journeys
/ \ - Slow but comprehensive
/--------\ Integration Tests (20%)
/ \ - Component interactions
/------------\ - API contracts
/ \ Unit Tests (70%)
/________________\ - Fast, isolated
- Business logic focus| Type | Recommended | Alternative |
|---|---|---|
| Unit | Vitest | Jest |
| Integration | Vitest + MSW | Jest + SuperTest |
| E2E | Playwright | Cypress |
| Component | Testing Library | Enzyme |
| Type | Recommended | Alternative |
|---|---|---|
| Unit | pytest | unittest |
| Integration | pytest + httpx | pytest + requests |
| E2E | Playwright | Selenium |
| API | pytest + FastAPI TestClient | - |
| Type | Recommended |
|---|---|
| Unit | testing + testify |
| Integration | testing + httptest |
| E2E | testing + chromedp |
describe("[Unit] ComponentName", () => {
describe("methodName", () => {
it("should [expected behavior] when [condition]", () => {
// Arrange
const input = createTestInput();
// Act
const result = methodName(input);
// Assert
expect(result).toEqual(expectedOutput);
});
it("should throw error when [invalid condition]", () => {
expect(() => methodName(invalidInput)).toThrow(ExpectedError);
});
});
});describe("[Integration] API /users", () => {
beforeAll(async () => {
await setupTestDatabase();
});
afterAll(async () => {
await teardownTestDatabase();
});
it("should create user and return 201", async () => {
const response = await request(app)
.post("/users")
.send({ name: "Test", email: "[email protected]" });
expect(response.status).toBe(201);
expect(response.body.id).toBeDefined();
});
});describe("[E2E] User Registration Flow", () => {
it("should complete registration successfully", async ({ page }) => {
await page.goto("/register");
await page.fill('[data-testid="email"]', "[email protected]");
await page.fill('[data-testid="password"]', "SecurePass123!");
await page.click('[data-testid="submit"]');
await expect(page.locator(".welcome-message")).toBeVisible();
await expect(page).toHaveURL("/dashboard");
});
});{
"coverageThreshold": {
"global": {
"branches": 80,
"functions": 80,
"lines": 80,
"statements": 80
},
"src/core/": {
"branches": 95,
"functions": 95
}
}
}// factories/user.js
export const userFactory = (overrides = {}) => ({
id: faker.string.uuid(),
name: faker.person.fullName(),
email: faker.internet.email(),
createdAt: new Date(),
...overrides,
});
// Usage
const admin = userFactory({ role: "admin" });// fixtures/users.json
{
"validUser": { "name": "Test", "email": "[email protected]" },
"invalidUser": { "name": "", "email": "invalid" }
}// API mocking with MSW
import { http, HttpResponse } from "msw";
export const handlers = [
http.get("/api/users", () => {
return HttpResponse.json([{ id: 1, name: "John" }]);
}),
];
// Time mocking
vi.useFakeTimers();
vi.setSystemTime(new Date("2024-01-01"));After writing tests, run this validation:
Test Validation:
- [ ] All tests pass: `npm test`
- [ ] Coverage meets thresholds: `npm test -- --coverage`
- [ ] No flaky tests (run multiple times)
- [ ] Tests are independent (order doesn't matter)
- [ ] Test names clearly describe behaviorIf any tests fail, fix them before proceeding. If coverage is below target, add more tests for uncovered code paths.
# Run tests
npm test
# Run with coverage
npm test -- --coverage
# Run specific test file
npm test -- path/to/test.spec.ts
# Run in watch mode during development
npm test -- --watch~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.