ab-test — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited ab-test (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Analyze experiment results and deliver a clear ship, iterate, or no-ship recommendation.
describe_database with the database name from $ARGUMENTS. Identify the table containing experiment results. Look for columns indicating: group assignment (treatment/control), the primary metric, and any segmentation variables.execute_query to sample rows from the experiment table. Confirm the group labels (e.g., "control" vs "treatment", "A" vs "B"). Note the metric column name and type. Check for any timestamp or user ID columns.execute_query with a query that counts observations per group and computes mean/stddev of the primary metric per group. Verify that group sizes are roughly balanced (within 10% of each other). Flag any imbalance as a potential validity concern.analyze_ab_test with the database name, metric column, and group column. Review the test results: test statistic, p-value, confidence interval for the difference, and the detected difference between groups.analyze_effect_sizes with the same data. Get Cohen's d or the appropriate effect size measure. Classify the effect:/localdata-mcp:analyze-correlations to find heterogeneous treatment effects.~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.