meta-analysis-e6afa7 — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited meta-analysis-e6afa7 (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
data {
int<lower=0> K; // Number of studies
vector[K] y; // Effect estimates
vector<lower=0>[K] se; // Standard errors
}
parameters {
real theta; // Common effect
}
model {
theta ~ normal(0, 10);
y ~ normal(theta, se);
}model {
for (i in 1:K) {
y[i] ~ dnorm(theta, prec[i])
prec[i] <- pow(se[i], -2)
}
theta ~ dnorm(0, 0.0001)
}data {
int<lower=0> K;
vector[K] y;
vector<lower=0>[K] se;
}
parameters {
real mu; // Overall mean
real<lower=0> tau; // Between-study SD
vector[K] eta; // Study effects (standardized)
}
transformed parameters {
vector[K] theta = mu + tau * eta;
}
model {
// Priors
mu ~ normal(0, 10);
tau ~ cauchy(0, 0.5); // Half-Cauchy
eta ~ std_normal();
// Likelihood
y ~ normal(theta, se);
}
generated quantities {
real theta_new = normal_rng(mu, tau); // Predictive
real I2 = square(tau) / (square(tau) + mean(square(se)));
}model {
for (i in 1:K) {
y[i] ~ dnorm(theta[i], prec[i])
prec[i] <- pow(se[i], -2)
theta[i] ~ dnorm(mu, tau.theta)
}
mu ~ dnorm(0, 0.0001)
tau.theta <- pow(sigma.theta, -2)
sigma.theta ~ dunif(0, 10)
# Heterogeneity
tau2 <- pow(sigma.theta, 2)
}data {
int<lower=0> K;
array[K] int<lower=0> r1; // Events in treatment
array[K] int<lower=0> n1; // Total in treatment
array[K] int<lower=0> r2; // Events in control
array[K] int<lower=0> n2; // Total in control
}
parameters {
real d; // Overall log-OR
real<lower=0> tau;
vector[K] delta; // Study-specific log-OR
vector[K] mu; // Baseline log-odds
}
model {
d ~ normal(0, 10);
tau ~ cauchy(0, 0.5);
delta ~ normal(d, tau);
mu ~ normal(0, 10);
r2 ~ binomial_logit(n2, mu);
r1 ~ binomial_logit(n1, mu + delta);
}
generated quantities {
real OR = exp(d);
}data {
int<lower=0> K; // Number of studies
int<lower=0> T; // Number of treatments
array[K] int<lower=1> t1; // Treatment 1 index
array[K] int<lower=1> t2; // Treatment 2 index
vector[K] y; // Effect estimate
vector<lower=0>[K] se;
}
parameters {
vector[T-1] d_raw; // Basic parameters (vs reference)
real<lower=0> tau;
vector[K] delta;
}
transformed parameters {
vector[T] d;
d[1] = 0; // Reference treatment
d[2:T] = d_raw;
}
model {
d_raw ~ normal(0, 10);
tau ~ cauchy(0, 0.5);
for (k in 1:K) {
delta[k] ~ normal(d[t2[k]] - d[t1[k]], tau);
y[k] ~ normal(delta[k], se[k]);
}
}
generated quantities {
// Treatment rankings
array[T] int rank;
{
array[T] int order = sort_indices_desc(d);
for (t in 1:T) rank[order[t]] = t;
}
}data {
int<lower=0> K;
vector[K] y;
vector<lower=0>[K] se;
vector<lower=0,upper=1>[K] published; // Publication indicator
}
parameters {
real mu;
real<lower=0> tau;
vector[K] theta;
real<lower=0> alpha; // Selection severity
}
model {
theta ~ normal(mu, tau);
y ~ normal(theta, se);
// Selection model: higher z-scores more likely published
for (k in 1:K) {
real z = y[k] / se[k];
published[k] ~ bernoulli(Phi(alpha * z));
}
}generated quantities {
// Heterogeneity
real tau2 = square(tau);
real I2 = tau2 / (tau2 + mean(square(se)));
// Prediction interval
real pred_lower = mu - 1.96 * tau;
real pred_upper = mu + 1.96 * tau;
// Probability effect > 0
real prob_positive = 1 - normal_cdf(0 | mu, tau);
}| Context | tau prior |
|---|---|
| Pharmacological | normal(0, 0.5) with tau <lower=0> |
| Medical devices | normal(0, 1) with tau <lower=0> |
| Behavioral | cauchy(0, 1) with tau <lower=0> |
| Default | cauchy(0, 0.5) with tau <lower=0> |
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.