clinical-trials — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited clinical-trials (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Comprehensive clinical trial design and analysis methods in R covering sample size calculation, randomization, interim analyses, multiplicity adjustment, and regulatory-compliant statistical methods.
library(pwr)
# Two-sample t-test
pwr.t.test(
d = 0.5, # Cohen's d effect size
sig.level = 0.05,
power = 0.80,
type = "two.sample",
alternative = "two.sided"
)
# Proportions (chi-square)
pwr.2p.test(
h = ES.h(p1 = 0.6, p2 = 0.4), # Cohen's h
sig.level = 0.05,
power = 0.80
)
# Two proportions (unequal groups)
pwr.2p2n.test(
h = ES.h(p1 = 0.6, p2 = 0.4),
n1 = 100,
sig.level = 0.05
)library(gsDesign)
# Log-rank test sample size
nSurv(
lambda1 = log(2)/12, # Control median = 12 months
lambda2 = log(2)/18, # Treatment median = 18 months (HR = 0.67)
Ts = 24, # Study duration
Tr = 12, # Accrual duration
alpha = 0.025, # One-sided
beta = 0.20, # 80% power
ratio = 1 # 1:1 randomization
)
# Using rpact
library(rpact)
getSampleSizeSurvival(
hazardRatio = 0.67,
lambda1 = log(2)/12,
accrualTime = 12,
followUpTime = 12,
alpha = 0.025,
beta = 0.20,
allocationRatioPlanned = 1
)library(TrialSize)
# Non-inferiority for proportions
TwoSampleProportion.NIS(
p = 0.80, # Expected proportion in both groups
delta = 0.10, # Non-inferiority margin
alpha = 0.025, # One-sided
power = 0.80
)
# Non-inferiority for means
TwoSampleMean.NIS(
sigma = 10, # SD
delta = 5, # Non-inferiority margin
alpha = 0.025,
power = 0.80
)# Base R simple randomization
set.seed(123)
n <- 100
treatment <- sample(c("A", "B"), n, replace = TRUE)
# blockrand package
library(blockrand)
randomization <- blockrand(
n = 100,
num.levels = 2,
levels = c("Treatment", "Control"),
id.prefix = "PAT",
block.prefix = "BLK"
)library(blockrand)
# Generate lists for each stratum
strata <- expand.grid(
sex = c("Male", "Female"),
age_group = c("<65", ">=65")
)
rand_lists <- lapply(1:nrow(strata), function(i) {
blockrand(
n = 50,
num.levels = 2,
levels = c("Treatment", "Control"),
block.sizes = c(2, 4, 6), # Variable block sizes
stratum = paste(strata[i, ], collapse = "_")
)
})
full_list <- do.call(rbind, rand_lists)library(Minirand)
# Minimization randomization
minirand(
covariates = data.frame(
sex = c("M", "F", "M"),
age = c("young", "old", "young"),
center = c("A", "A", "B")
),
treatment = c("A", "B"),
ratio = c(1, 1),
p = 0.85 # Probability of assigning to minimizing treatment
)For randomized trials, baseline tables should primarily describe the randomized groups and assess clinically meaningful imbalance. Routine baseline hypothesis tests are usually not appropriate because any baseline differences arise after randomization and p-values mostly reflect sample size.
library(gtsummary)
baseline_table <- adsl |>
dplyr::filter(ITTFL == "Y") |>
dplyr::select(TRT01P, AGE, SEX, BMI, BASELINE_SCORE) |>
tbl_summary(
by = TRT01P,
statistic = list(
all_continuous() ~ "{mean} ({sd})",
all_categorical() ~ "{n} ({p}%)"
)
) |>
modify_header(label = "**Characteristic**")If the SAP requires standardized mean differences, report them as descriptive diagnostics rather than randomization tests.
library(gsDesign)
# O'Brien-Fleming boundaries
gs_design <- gsDesign(
k = 3, # Number of analyses
test.type = 2, # Two-sided symmetric
alpha = 0.025, # One-sided alpha
beta = 0.20, # Type II error
sfu = "OF", # O'Brien-Fleming spending function
timing = c(0.5, 0.75, 1) # Information fractions
)
# Summary
gs_design
# Boundaries
gs_design$upper$bound # Upper efficacy boundary
gs_design$lower$bound # Lower futility boundary
# Plot
plot(gs_design)# Pocock
gs_pocock <- gsDesign(k = 3, sfu = "Pocock")
# Hwang-Shih-DeCani
gs_hsd <- gsDesign(k = 3, sfu = sfHSD, sfupar = -4)
# Power family (Kim-DeMets)
gs_power <- gsDesign(k = 3, sfu = sfPower, sfupar = 2)
# Custom spending
gs_custom <- gsDesign(
k = 3,
sfu = sfPoints,
sfupar = c(0.01, 0.03, 0.025), # Cumulative alpha at each look
timing = c(0.5, 0.75, 1)
)library(rpact)
# Design
design <- getDesignGroupSequential(
kMax = 3,
alpha = 0.025,
beta = 0.20,
sided = 1,
typeOfDesign = "OF", # O'Brien-Fleming
informationRates = c(0.5, 0.75, 1)
)
# Sample size
sampleSize <- getSampleSizeMeans(
design = design,
alternative = 0.5,
stDev = 1
)
# Interim analysis
getAnalysisResults(
design,
dataInput = getDataset(
n = c(50, 75),
means = c(0.3, 0.4),
stDevs = c(1, 1)
)
)# Bonferroni
p.adjust(p_values, method = "bonferroni")
# Holm (step-down)
p.adjust(p_values, method = "holm")
# Hochberg (step-up)
p.adjust(p_values, method = "hochberg")
# Benjamini-Hochberg (FDR)
p.adjust(p_values, method = "BH")
# Hommel
p.adjust(p_values, method = "hommel")library(gMCP)
# Define hypothesis graph
graph <- matrix2graph(
# Transition matrix
m = matrix(c(
0, 0.5, 0.5, 0,
0.5, 0, 0, 0.5,
0.5, 0, 0, 0.5,
0, 0.5, 0.5, 0
), nrow = 4, byrow = TRUE),
# Initial weights
w = c(0.5, 0.5, 0, 0)
)
# Set hypothesis names
nodeNames(graph) <- c("H1_OS", "H2_OS", "H1_PFS", "H2_PFS")
# Plot graph
plot(graph)
# Perform test
gMCP(
graph = graph,
pvalues = c(0.01, 0.03, 0.02, 0.04),
alpha = 0.025
)library(multcomp)
# Serial gatekeeping
# Primary must be significant before testing secondary
serial_gate <- function(p_primary, p_secondary, alpha = 0.05) {
if (p_primary < alpha) {
# Primary significant, test secondary at full alpha
return(c(primary = p_primary < alpha, secondary = p_secondary < alpha))
} else {
return(c(primary = FALSE, secondary = FALSE))
}
}library(mmrm)
# MMRM model
mmrm_fit <- mmrm(
formula = change ~ treatment * visit + baseline + us(visit | subject),
data = long_data,
weights = NULL,
reml = TRUE
)
# Least squares means
library(emmeans)
emmeans(mmrm_fit, ~ treatment | visit)
# Treatment comparison at each visit
emmeans(mmrm_fit, pairwise ~ treatment | visit)library(mice)
# Create imputations
imp <- mice(
data = df,
m = 20, # Number of imputations
method = "pmm", # Predictive mean matching
maxit = 10
)
# Analyze each imputed dataset
analyses <- with(imp, lm(outcome ~ treatment + covariates))
# Pool results (Rubin's rules)
pooled <- pool(analyses)
summary(pooled)# Sensitivity analysis for MNAR
library(rbmi)
# Define imputation method with delta adjustment
draws <- draws(
data = data,
data_ice = ice_data,
method = method_bayes(),
vars = vars
)
# Impute with different delta values
impute(draws, references = c("Control" = "Control", "Treatment" = "Control"))library(forestplot)
# Calculate treatment effects by subgroup
subgroup_effects <- df |>
group_by(subgroup) |>
summarise(
n = n(),
effect = mean(outcome[trt == 1]) - mean(outcome[trt == 0]),
se = sqrt(var(outcome[trt == 1])/sum(trt == 1) +
var(outcome[trt == 0])/sum(trt == 0)),
lower = effect - 1.96 * se,
upper = effect + 1.96 * se
)
# Create forest plot
forestplot(
labeltext = subgroup_effects$subgroup,
mean = subgroup_effects$effect,
lower = subgroup_effects$lower,
upper = subgroup_effects$upper,
zero = 0,
xlab = "Treatment Effect (95% CI)"
)# Test for treatment-by-subgroup interaction
interaction_model <- lm(outcome ~ treatment * subgroup, data = df)
anova(interaction_model)
# Quantitative interaction test
library(QI)
qi_test(outcome ~ treatment | subgroup, data = df)# Define estimand components:
# 1. Treatment condition
# 2. Population
# 3. Variable (endpoint)
# 4. Intercurrent events and strategies
# 5. Population-level summary measure
# Example: Treatment policy estimand with MMRM
mmrm_fit <- mmrm(
change ~ treatment * visit + baseline + us(visit | subject),
data = data_all_randomized # Include all randomized (ITT)
)Missing-data methods should follow the estimand and the plausible missingness mechanism. Prespecify primary handling and sensitivity analyses rather than defaulting to complete-case analysis.
library(consort)
# Create CONSORT diagram
consort_plot(
data = trial_data,
orders = c(
Assessed = "Assessed for eligibility",
Randomized = "Randomized",
Arm_A = "Allocated to Arm A",
Arm_B = "Allocated to Arm B",
Lost_A = "Lost to follow-up (Arm A)",
Lost_B = "Lost to follow-up (Arm B)",
Analyzed_A = "Analyzed (Arm A)",
Analyzed_B = "Analyzed (Arm B)"
),
side_box = c("Excluded", "Discontinued_A", "Discontinued_B"),
cex = 0.8
)| Package | Purpose |
|---|---|
| pwr | Power analysis |
| gsDesign | Group sequential designs |
| rpact | Adaptive designs |
| blockrand | Randomization |
| gMCP | Graphical multiplicity |
| mmrm | MMRM analysis |
| mice | Multiple imputation |
| rbmi | Reference-based imputation |
| emmeans | Least squares means |
| consort | CONSORT diagrams |
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.