social-sciences-in-china — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited social-sciences-in-china (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
中国社会科学院主办,综合性、跨学科社科第一刊。它不是"经济学刊"也不是"管理学刊"——经济、社会、政治、法学、历史、哲学共处一刊。衡量标准是思想分量,而非方法复杂度。 一篇技术精致但问题琐碎的实证文,几乎必然不在射程内。
黄金句式:本文不只回答"X 是否影响 Y",而是回答"X→Y 这一现象揭示了什么一般机理 / 修正了哪个既有理论判断"。
securities-market-herald(《证券市场导报》) / shanghai-journal-of-economics(《上海经济研究》) / social-security-studies(《社会保障评论》) / sociological-studies(《社会学研究》)。若这些刊物的读者对象更贴近,不要因为名称、地区或变量相似而强行投本刊。../../resources/source-basis.md 和 ../../resources/official-source-map.md,从其中的官方来源锚点或同一主办/出版体系入口开始核验,并在回答中说明核验日期。【匹配度】高 / 中 / 低(理由一句话)
【原创命题】<本文可一句话陈述的理论命题>
【问题层级】文明/制度/治理 | 行业/细分(后者需上移)
【理论对话缺口】<缺哪个流派/经典>
【炫技风险】有 / 无(方法是否翻译成思想)
【建议去向】本刊 / 改投 <期刊>~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.