journal-of-membrane-science — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited journal-of-membrane-science (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Journal of Membrane Science (Elsevier) is the leading archival venue for membranes and membrane processes: membrane materials and formation, the mechanisms of transport and separation, separation performance, fouling, and applications in water, gas, energy, and bio. Its defining expectation is that the membrane and its transport/separation mechanism are central — a paper must explain how the membrane structure governs permeation and selectivity, not merely report that a new membrane separated something. Studies that use a commercial membrane as a black box to treat a feed, or that report a permeance number without structure–transport understanding, are a weak fit. This skill is a fit / venue-selection / re-framing tool. It does not replace the journal's current official author guidelines. Before submitting, re-check the live Journal of Membrane Science Guide for Authors on the Elsevier site.
separation, or fouling manuscript and wants a fit/framing check.
structure–transport–separation mechanism story.
(chemical-engineering-journal) or a fundamentals venue (aiche-journal).
and desk-reject heuristics.
membranes; phase inversion, interfacial polymerization, and fabrication structure–property control.
the link between membrane structure/chemistry and permeability and selectivity.
gas separation, pervaporation, membrane distillation, electrodialysis.
mitigation strategies.
membranes, bioseparations) when the membrane transport science is central.
chemistry set permeability, selectivity, or fouling resistance — supported by data, not asserted.
driving force, and conditions made explicit, and benchmarked against the relevant trade-off (e.g., permeability–selectivity) and prior membranes.
(cross-section, surface), chemistry, porosity/free volume, and stability, with sampling and reproducibility reported.
mechanism analyzed rather than only a flux-decline curve shown.
conditions; normalized, reproducible metrics are expected.
discussion); the journal uses highlights and a graphical abstract — re-check current article types and requirements on the live guide.
discussion makes the structure–transport–performance argument explicit.
against the relevant trade-off line, and fouling/stability data with controls.
and long-term data; main-text figures must support the transport claim on their own.
../../resources/source-basis.md and../../resources/official-source-map.md; start from the Elsevier anchors, then cite the current Journal of Membrane Science Guide for Authors page you checked.
the current Elsevier/Editorial Manager version.
reporting conventions for permeation/selectivity (units, normalization).
test conditions for reproducibility.
disclosure requirements.
instructions win.
chemical-engineering-journal.aiche-journal.applied-energy.journal-of-power-sources.environmental-science-and-technology.[Fit] High / Medium / Low (one-line reason)
[Target] Journal of Membrane Science
[Topic tags] <2–3 closest membrane subtopics>
[Mechanism] <the structure–transport–separation claim in one line>
[Performance] <permeability/selectivity vs trade-off + conditions stated?>
[Stability/fouling] <realistic-feed + mechanism evidence present?>
[Top risk] <the single most likely reason for rejection>
[Official items to re-check] <article type / highlights / units-normalization / data policy / disclosures>
[Re-route suggestion] <if not a fit, a better-matched venue>~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.