joap-submission — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited joap-submission (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
The last check before submitting through Editorial Manager (editorialmanager.com/apl). Three things sink JAP submissions most often: a missing or weak theoretical contribution surfacing late, broken masking, and incomplete open-science compliance. Verify volatile specifics (length caps, abstract limit, checklist contents, current editor) on the official APA page first.
editorialmanager.com/apl.upload and signifies you have read and will follow the guidelines.
confirm current page cap, 待核实); theory-development / integrative review; qualitative; meta-analysis.
data/materials/code availability with DOIs, a data-availability statement, and preregistration weighed (effective for empirical submissions; confirm current TOP level, 待核实).
Running the servant-leadership package through the gate the night before upload:
Style: APA 7th throughout; structured abstract drafted (confirm limit) → PASS*
Contribution: cross-level mechanism + boundary stated by p.3 → PASS
Masking: no names; self-cites neutralized; OSF anonymized-view links;
PDF metadata stripped; separate title page → PASS
Open sci: data + materials + code each have a DOI; data-availability
statement + prior-use note; experiment preregistration linked → PASS
Stats: CFA fit + reliabilities reported; indirect = .13, 95% CI [.05, .23];
multilevel model + ICC/r_wg; CMV remedies declared → PASS
Verdict: ready to upload to Editorial Manager.
*Re-confirm the current abstract limit and Research Report cap on the APA page.| Failure | Caught by | Quick fix |
|---|---|---|
| Author name in self-citation or OSF link | masking check | neutralize self-cites; switch to anonymized view |
| Abstract over the current limit | abstract check | cut to the limit; keep contribution + design + result |
| "Data on request" instead of a DOI | open-science check | deposit and mint a persistent identifier |
| No data-availability statement | TOP check | draft it from the live DOIs |
| Table 1 missing reliabilities; paths lack CIs | exhibit check | add ω to the diagonal; add CIs + fit indices |
Volatile specifics (length caps, abstract limit, TOP level, checklist contents, current editor) change. Re-confirm every item above against the journal's current submission guidelines before relying on it. See templates/checklist.md for a copy-paste preflight list.【Style】APA 7th + article type + abstract within limit (待核实)? [Y/N]
【Contribution legible early?】[Y/N]
【Masking】manuscript + self-cites + repo links + metadata + title page? [Y/N]
【Open science】data + materials + code + DOIs + availability statement? [Y/N]
【Stats】measurement model + ES/CIs + indirect CIs + nesting + disclosure? [Y/N]
【Next】await decision → joap-rebuttal on R&Rtemplates/checklist.md — copy-paste pre-submission preflight checklist../../resources/external_tools.md — repositories, DOIs, papaja, SEM/HLM/meta tooling../../resources/official-source-map.md — official APA Journal of Applied Psychology URLs behind every fact in this pack~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.