Exhibits: Tables & Figures (jet-tables-figures)

When to trigger

• You need a diagram to convey an equilibrium, a mechanism, or a comparative-static
• You have a small numerical table illustrating a theorem
• You are formatting exhibits for elsarticle submission

What exhibits look like at JET

JET is a theorem-proof journal, so most exhibits are schematic, not data-driven. The typical JET figure clarifies an argument:

• Best-response / phase diagrams, indifference maps, region partitions of a parameter space
• Lattices / Hasse diagrams for order-theoretic results; timing / extensive-form trees for games
• Mechanism / information flow diagrams; revelation or allocation schematics
• Bound / tightness plots showing where a characterized object sits

Numerical tables are light and subordinate — admitted only to illustrate or test a theoretical result (see jet-data-analysis), never as the paper's payload.

Construction rules

• Notation must match the body exactly — same symbols, same names for regions/agents/types. A figure

that renames objects costs the referee more than it saves.

• Vector output (PDF/EPS) for print; build diagrams in TikZ/PGF (native to elsarticle LaTeX) or

pgfplots; export matplotlib/Julia plots to PDF.

• Self-contained captions/notes: define every symbol, axis, and shaded region in the note so the

exhibit reads without the surrounding text.

• Label the economics, not just the math: name what a region/curve means (e.g., "pooling region"),

not only the inequality that defines it.

• Number figures/tables and call them out in order in the text.

Exhibit necessity test

Keep an exhibit only if it does one of four jobs:

• Makes a theorem's domain or partition visible.
• Shows a counterexample or tightness construction.
• Clarifies a mechanism, timing, information flow, or allocation rule.
• Reproduces a small numerical illustration that is subordinate to a formal result.

If the exhibit is decorative or repeats a proof step without reducing cognitive load, delete it. JET referees value proof clarity more than visual volume.

Default schematic by result type

TikZ skeleton for a region partition

\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=3]
  \draw[->] (0,0) -- (1.05,0) node[below] {$\alpha$ (ambiguity)};
  \draw[->] (0,0) -- (0,1.05) node[left]  {$\Delta$ (type gap)};
  \draw[thick] (0,0) .. controls (0.5,0.45) .. (1,0.6); % boundary from Prop. 3, eq. (11)
  \node at (0.30,0.72) {separating};
  \node at (0.70,0.22) {pooling};
\end{tikzpicture}
% Note text: symbols identical to the body; the boundary is the locus where (IC-H) binds, eq. (11).

Adapt the axes and boundary to your model, but keep the pattern: every drawn object traces back to a numbered equation or constraint in the text.

Caption discipline

• Sentence 1: what the exhibit shows in economic terms ("Figure 2 partitions the

ambiguity–type-gap plane into pooling and separating regions").

• Middle sentences: define every symbol, axis, and shaded region; name the equation generating

each curve.

• Last sentence: parameter values if numerical, with a pointer to the script that regenerates the

exhibit (see jet-data-analysis).

Anti-patterns

• A figure introducing notation that conflicts with the proof
• Raster screenshots or low-resolution diagrams
• A large numerical table presented as a result in a theory paper
• A diagram with no self-contained note, unreadable away from its paragraph

Output format

【Exhibit】<schematic type> | small illustrative table
【Notation match】identical to body? [Y/N]
【Format】vector (TikZ/PDF), self-contained note? [Y/N]
【Role】clarifies argument | illustrates theorem (subordinate)
【Next】jet-writing-style / jet-submission