jedpsych-workflow — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited jedpsych-workflow (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
The orchestrator for a Journal of Educational Psychology (JEP) submission. JEP is the APA's flagship outlet for original, primary psychological research on learning and instruction across all ages. Its defining features are masked review, an educational-relevance bar (the result must matter for real learners in real settings), and a credibility regime built on APA 7th, JARS reporting standards, and a required Transparency and Openness subsection — the router makes sure each is handled from the start, then sends you to the matching skill.
jedpsych-rebuttal)| Situation | Type | Route note |
|---|---|---|
| Completed experiment / field trial / longitudinal study | Primary empirical article | main pipeline below |
| Several studies building one cumulative claim | Multi-study article | each study must add inference, not repeat |
| Cluster-randomized / classroom intervention, not yet run | Prospective field trial | pull jedpsych-study-design + jedpsych-review-process forward; consider preregistration |
| Exceptionally important synthesis | Meta-analysis | follow APA MARS; jedpsych-data-analysis (meta route) |
| Reliability/validity of one test | Usually out of scope | JEP does not typically publish single-instrument validation |
Fits JEP's learning/education scope? → jedpsych-topic-selection
Theory + hypotheses stated up front? → jedpsych-theory-and-hypotheses
Where does it sit in the field? → jedpsych-literature-positioning
Design / nesting / power / measures? → jedpsych-study-design
Multilevel/SEM sound + effect sizes? → jedpsych-data-analysis
Exhibits (APA 7th, models, growth)? → jedpsych-tables-figures
Fits 12,000 words, masked, APA? → jedpsych-writing-style
Data/materials/code + TOP statement? → jedpsych-open-science-and-transparency
How will it be judged? → jedpsych-review-process
Ready to submit (Editorial Manager)? → jedpsych-submission
Got an R&R / decision? → jedpsych-rebuttaltopic-selection → theory-and-hypotheses → literature-positioning → study-design → data-analysis → tables-figures → writing-style → open-science-and-transparency → review-process → submission → rebuttal
For a prospective cluster-randomized trial, pull study-design and review-process forward — power for nesting and a registration/analysis plan should be settled before schools are recruited.
A team has a cluster-randomized reading-comprehension intervention (48 classrooms, ~1,100 students), pretest covariate, and a reviewer worried about power and clustering. The router walks them:
Type: Primary empirical article (field trial, results in hand).
Entry: not idea-stage → skip topic-selection; they are at design/analysis.
Route: study-design (nesting, ICC, cluster-level power, baseline equivalence)
→ data-analysis (multilevel model, cluster-robust inference, effect size)
→ tables-figures (model table + growth/forest exhibit)
→ writing-style (fit 12,000 words, APA 7th, masked)
→ open-science-and-transparency (TOP subsection, deposit + IDs)
→ submission (Editorial Manager preflight) ; on R&R → rebuttal.
Flag: power and the effect size must be at the CLUSTER level; a student-level
power claim is the classic JEP design error.| What the author says | Stage | Route to |
|---|---|---|
| "Is this educational enough for JEP?" | fit | jedpsych-topic-selection |
| "My intro reads like a textbook chapter" | positioning | jedpsych-literature-positioning |
| "Reviewer says I ignored clustering" | design/analysis | jedpsych-study-design + jedpsych-data-analysis |
| "What goes in the Transparency statement?" | transparency | jedpsych-open-science-and-transparency |
| "My paper is 14,500 words" | format | jedpsych-writing-style |
| "I have an R&R" | revision | jedpsych-rebuttal |
jedpsych-data-analysis before jedpsych-study-designhas fixed the nesting and cluster-level power — at JEP the multilevel structure must be designed in, not patched in analysis.
teaching, or educational practice** — JEP's scope screen is educational relevance, not psychology alone.
jedpsych-open-science-and-transparency to the end; the Transparency and Openness subsectionis built from live deposits and persistent identifiers, not promised at acceptance.
【Stage】fit / theory / positioning / design / analysis / exhibits / writing / transparency / review / submit / rebut
【Type】Primary empirical / Multi-study / Prospective trial / Meta-analysis
【Route to】jedpsych-<skill>
【Why】one line
【Then】the next skill after that../../resources/external_tools.md — power for nested designs, multilevel/SEM software, preregistration, repositories../../resources/official-source-map.md — official APA Journal of Educational Psychology URLs behind every fact in this pack~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.