jedpsych-topic-selection — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited jedpsych-topic-selection (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
The Journal of Educational Psychology publishes original, primary psychological research pertaining to education across all ages and educational levels (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准). The bar is a finding that is theoretically grounded, methodologically rigorous, and educationally consequential — it should change how psychologists understand learning, motivation, achievement, or instruction and matter for learners in schools, classrooms, or online settings. Use this skill to pressure-test fit before investing.
A strong JEP paper usually clears all four:
reading/math/science learning, assessment, self-regulation, or instruction — and the result has a defensible implication for educational practice or policy. State who in education inherits the claim.
psychological research journal, not a program-evaluation outlet (see jedpsych-theory-and-hypotheses).
or schools, the design and analysis must respect that nesting (see jedpsych-study-design, jedpsych-data-analysis).
field trials, authentic tasks, and real learners strengthen fit.
longitudinal study with a learning-relevant outcome.
→ boundary, replication → extension); each study must add inference.
pertinent to educational psychology; follow APA meta-analysis reporting standards.
Score a candidate against the four gates before investing. A reading-intervention project, two framings:
Candidate A (off-fit): a lab study showing a memory-encoding effect on word
lists, N = 60 undergraduates, no link to instruction.
Educational relevance ✗ Theory ✓ Rigor ~ (small) Ecological ✗
Verdict: off-fit for JEP → general cognition outlet, or rebuild as a
classroom learning study with an instructional implication.
Candidate B (strong): cluster-randomized comprehension-strategy intervention,
48 classrooms (~1,100 students), pretest covariate, transfer outcome.
Educational relevance ✓ (classroom reading) Theory ✓ (strategy-instruction
mechanism) Rigor ✓ (cluster-powered) Ecological ✓ (real classrooms)
Verdict: strong fit → primary empirical article.| If the work is... | Target type | Why |
|---|---|---|
| One completed learning study, results in hand | Primary empirical article | the standard JEP slot |
| A cumulative claim built across studies | Multi-study article | each study must add inference, not repeat |
| A prospective classroom/school trial, not yet run | Primary article (preregister) | settle nesting + power before recruiting |
| A field-defining quantitative synthesis | Meta-analysis | only if "exceptionally important"; follow MARS |
| Validation of one instrument | Specialty measurement journal | JEP does not typically publish these |
the real-setting evidence; if there is none, the venue is wrong.
the study tests, not just whether the program worked.
small number of clusters (route to jedpsych-study-design).
【Question / effect】one sentence
【Educational relevance】who in education inherits the claim
【Theory】the learning/motivation mechanism
【Rigor + setting】powered for its design? ecologically valid?
【Type】Primary empirical / Multi-study / Meta-analysis
【Fit verdict】strong / needs reframing / off-fit (why)
【Next】jedpsych-theory-and-hypotheses../../resources/external_tools.md — power for nested designs, preregistration tools../../resources/official-source-map.md — JEP aims, scope, and accepted manuscript types~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.