jedpsych-open-science-and-transparency — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited jedpsych-open-science-and-transparency (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
The Journal of Educational Psychology follows APA's transparency-and-openness framework. Manuscripts include a Transparency and Openness subsection that states whether data, materials, and analysis code are deposited in trusted repositories with persistent identifiers — or states that they are unavailable (with reasons). Reporting follows JARS; preregistration is encouraged but not mandatory (disclose status and link); and Open Science Badges (Open Data, Open Materials, Preregistered) are available with a signed disclosure form (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准). Prepare this early — and keep every shared link anonymized for masked review.
whether each is openly available, available under restriction, or unavailable — and where (repository + persistent identifier / DOI). If something is not shared, say so and why.
(quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods), and JARS-REC for race, ethnicity, and culture reporting. Meta-analyses follow the meta-analysis reporting standards.
link; report deviations from the plan. Preregistration is weighed favorably but is not required.
transient personal links.
requires a signed badge disclosure form submitted as supplemental material.
(use anonymized views); strip identifying metadata.
statement)
state exactly what is withheld, why, and how others can access or approximate it (application path, de-identified/synthetic data, secure enclave, code release). Document this in the subsection; unjustified opacity counts against the paper.
A model statement for the cluster-randomized reading trial. Confirm the exact required headings/wording against the journal's current submission guidelines.
Transparency and Openness
Data: De-identified student-level data for the trial are available
at OSF (DOI 10.XXXX/osf.io/abcde) with a codebook; raw
identifiable data are governed by the district agreement and
available via application (path described).
Materials: The intervention protocol, fidelity rubric, and comprehension
measures (license permitting) are deposited (DOI 10.XXXX/osf.io/fghij).
Analysis: Analysis code (R, lme4 / lavaan) reproduces all reported values
in a fresh session; a run log is included (DOI 10.XXXX/osf.io/klmno).
Preregistration: The design, hypotheses, and analysis plan were preregistered
before data collection (osf.io/pqrst); one ATI analysis is
reported as exploratory. Reporting follows JARS (and JARS-REC).| Situation | Editorial read | What to deposit / state |
|---|---|---|
| Fully shareable de-identified data + materials | strong baseline | DOIs for data, materials, code + run log; consider badges |
| Protected student records (FERPA/IRB/district) | acceptable if justified | de-identified/synthetic data + gated access path; share code |
| Proprietary/licensed instrument | partial | share what license allows; cite source; share scoring code |
| Secondary / third-party dataset | acceptable with provenance | link source, share derivation code, document version |
| "Available on request" | reads as weak | replace with a persistent DOI or a documented access path |
submission goes out.
exploratory; keep confirmatory/exploratory consistent end to end.
【Data】deposited + DOI + codebook (or justified restriction)? [Y/N]
【Materials】deposited + DOI (or license statement)? [Y/N]
【Analysis code】deposited + fresh-session reproducible? [Y/N]
【Transparency subsection】drafted covering data/materials/code? [Y/N]
【Preregistration】disclosed + linked (anonymized) + deviations noted? [Y/N/NA]
【JARS / JARS-REC】walked for this design? [Y/N]
【Anonymized】links + metadata for masked review? [Y/N]
【Next】jedpsych-review-process../../resources/external_tools.md — OSF, ICPSR, Dataverse, Zenodo, JARS checklists, preregistration templates, DOIs../../resources/official-source-map.md — Transparency and Openness, JARS, preregistration, and Open Science Badge policy~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.