jbes-submission — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited jbes-submission (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
is offered as Open Select / hybrid open access.
T&F search snippet; target the cover letter accordingly (see jbes-review-process).
does not hard-code platform, fees, manuscript length, abstract limit, review anonymity model, or required citation style from indirect evidence.
| What gets a JBES submission bounced early | Fix this skill enforces |
|---|---|
| Strong theory, no empirical application | Add the substantive macro/finance/micro case; the empirics requirement is real, not optional |
| An off-the-shelf method on new data, no methodological increment | Reframe around the novel adaptation, or re-route to an applied economics journal |
| Data/code supplement missing | Assemble it per ASA expectation before pressing submit (see jbes-replication-and-data-policy) |
| Generic cover letter to a single "Editor" | Target a plausible handling Co-Editor; there is no single Editor-in-Chief |
| APC budgeted from a non-official figure | Treat the charge as Open Select/optional and confirm; do not assume a number |
Calibration anchor (hedged): JBES is published by Taylor & Francis on behalf of the ASA as Open Select (hybrid OA). Treat platform, fees, length and abstract limits, review-anonymity model, and citation style as live-page preflight items; do not infer them from other T&F journals.
Run this as a concrete capability pass. First lock the statistical estimand, identification/simulation evidence, empirical illustration, and reproducibility path; then test whether the manuscript addresses econometrics/statistics reviewers who expect methodological credibility plus a business or economic use case.
claim / evidence / blocker / next edit rows so the next pass can patch the manuscript directly.submission-only fact that could change the recommendation.
【Live T&F facts checked】platform / fee / length / abstract / review model / style? [Y/N]
【Manuscript】theorems + exhibits + references ready? [Y/N]
【Supplement】code+data + data availability statement + seeds? [Y/N]
【Declarations】COI / funding / not-under-review / restricted-data? [Y/N]
【Cover letter】method + relevance + Co-Editor targeting + referees? [Y/N]
【Next step】await decision → jbes-rebuttal on R&R~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.