jape-workflow — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited jape-workflow (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
JAE (Wiley, since 1986, Editor-in-Chief Barbara Rossi, 7 issues/year) publishes applied econometrics — techniques applied to real data, not pure theory. Its signature is reproducibility: accepted papers must deposit a complete set of non-confidential data (and typically code) in the JAE Data Archive (running since 1994, now hosted at ZBW). Plan that deposit from day one; it is not an afterthought.
jape-topic-selection, jape-contribution-framingjape-literature-positioningjape-identification-strategyjape-data-analysisjape-tables-figuresjape-writing-stylejape-replication-and-data-policyjape-submissionjape-review-processjape-rebuttalIn the last week before submission, run the route in this order:
jape-topic-selection: real-data application and replication path are still central.jape-data-analysis: master script regenerates every article and appendix exhibit.jape-tables-figures: article exhibits fit the 35-page limit and appendix material is staged.jape-replication-and-data-policy: archive files, README, versions, and plain-text outputs match.jape-writing-style and jape-submission: summary, keywords, declarations, and Editorial Expressmaterials are consistent.
Do not submit if the manuscript PDF and archive package disagree about a sample, variable, seed, or table label. That mismatch is a substantive credibility problem, not a clerical issue.
The archive deposit is the thread that runs through every stage; verify it at each gate rather than once at the end:
| Gate | Pass condition | Archive checkpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Project start | Real-data application with an econometric lesson | Data confirmed exportable to plain CSV/TXT, or documentable for access |
| First full draft | Estimand, design, inference all stated and tested | Master script regenerates every draft exhibit |
| Pre-submission | ≤35 pp text; summary ≤100 words, citation-free | Package cold-runs on a clean machine |
| Under review | — (wait; respect the 3-paper cap elsewhere) | Freeze the submitted package as a tagged version |
| Revision | Every referee point answered with evidence | Revised numbers and revised code committed together |
| Acceptance | Final exhibits match regenerated output digit-for-digit | Deposit to the ZBW-hosted archive with readme |
An author arrives with a finished panel-IV draft asking "what now?" Route: the draft is 39 pages → jape-tables-figures first (move two robustness grids to the appendix); the IV tables show no first-stage F → jape-data-analysis and jape-identification-strategy (effective F + Anderson–Rubin columns); data are a licensed commercial panel → jape-replication-and-data-policy (confidential-data readme + extraction code now, not after acceptance); only then jape-writing-style for the 100-word summary and jape-submission for Editorial Express. Three of the five stops exist only because the destination is JAE.
【Fit】applied on real data, replicable? [Y/N]
【Stage】lifecycle step (1–10)
【Gate】current stage's archive checkpoint passed? [Y/N]
【Next skill】which JAE skill now
【Archive】data/code on track for the Data Archive? [Y/N]../../resources/official-source-map.md — official JAE URLs behind every fact../../resources/external_tools.md — reproducibility tooling~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.