jape-replication-and-data-policy — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited jape-replication-and-data-policy (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Use this from day one, not only after acceptance — the deposit is the journal's signature norm.
JAE's defining norm: authors of accepted papers must deposit a complete set of the data used onto the Journal's Data Archive, unless the data are confidential. The archive has held data for all papers accepted since January 1994 and also stores programs, technical appendices, and supplementary material. Hosted at Queen's University (1994–2022, maintainer J. G. MacKinnon), it moved to ZBW's Journal Data Archive (journaldata.zbw.eu) in 2022 (~1,487 datasets).
If data are confidential, still provide a readme describing the data and its source in enough detail that others can apply for access, and ideally the extraction programs. Responsibility for permission rests with the investigator. Note proprietary data in the cover letter/paper.
Build the package in this sequence — each step catches a different failure class before the archive does:
table1.csv, fig2_data.txt, programs that announce which exhibit they build.README for [Author(s)], "[Title]", Journal of Applied Econometrics
1. Data files: [name] — source, sample span, units, variable list
2. Provenance: where each series was obtained; access date; license
3. Programs: run order; master script; software + version; seeds
4. Mapping: program → table/figure in the published paper
5. Confidential components: description + how to apply for access
Contact: [author email]Plain ASCII, no markup — the archive's own holdings are flat text and the readme should match.
JAE's dedicated replication track exists because the archive makes published results re-runnable. If you are submitting to it: pick a prominent target paper, obtain its archived (or otherwise public) data and code, and report what you find whether it confirms, qualifies, or overturns — negative replications are explicitly in scope. Separate three failure sources in your write-up: data revisions since the original, implementation/coding differences, and genuine fragility of the result. Confirm current track-specific instructions against the journal's author guidelines before submitting.
.dta or SAS file with no CSV/TXT sibling — violates the archive's plain-text rule outright.【Data】complete non-confidential set deposited? [Y/N]
【Format】plain ASCII/CSV + readme, no bare .dta/SAS? [Y/N]
【Programs】replicate every result; master script runs? [Y/N]
【Cold-run】clean-machine rerun matches published digits? [Y/N]
【Confidential】readme + access path + extraction programs? [Y/N/NA]
【Host】ZBW Journal Data Archive (journaldata.zbw.eu)../../resources/official-source-map.md — Data Archive instructions, host history, format rules../../resources/external_tools.md — exporting to text, master scripts, environment capsules~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.