jama-pediatrics — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited jama-pediatrics (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
JAMA Pediatrics is a JAMA Network specialty journal for clinical and population research on the health of infants, children, and adolescents. It favors rigorous, practice- and policy-relevant work — randomized pediatric trials, large child-health cohorts and population studies, prevention and developmental research, and health- services analyses — with JAMA's emphasis on age-appropriate outcomes, adequate power, and direct relevance to child and adolescent care. Studies that simply extrapolate adult findings, small descriptive series, and work using adult-derived outcomes without pediatric validation are a weak fit. This skill is a fit / venue-selection / re-framing aid; it is not clinical or regulatory advice and does not replace the journal's current instructions for authors. Before submitting, re-check the live JAMA Pediatrics author instructions.
developmental, or population study and wants a fit/framing check.
outcome for a child-health readership.
journal.
consent), reporting-guideline, registration, and desk-reject expectations.
age-appropriate primary outcomes, including pragmatic designs.
studies with rigorous confounding control.
with validated pediatric measures.
with appropriate sensitivity and ethics.
measures and be adequately powered; adult-derived endpoints need pediatric validation.
STROBE for observational studies, PRISMA for systematic reviews; report stratification by age/developmental stage where relevant.
statistical-analysis plan are expected.
assent appropriate to age, and protections for vulnerable populations (neonates, adolescents, maltreatment).
missing data; causal language must match the design.
article types (Original Investigation, Brief Report, Research Letter, etc.) and limits on the live guide.
states the clinical, developmental, or policy implication plainly.
flow diagrams and age-stratified results are expected where applicable.
additional analyses.
../../resources/source-basis.md and../../resources/official-source-map.md; start from the ICMJE and JAMA Network anchors, then cite the current JAMA Pediatrics page you checked.
current version.
Points format, and the JAMA Network statistical-reporting requirements.
data-sharing statement, and protocol/SAP submission.
protections, ICMJE disclosures, funding, and AI-use disclosure.
win.
jama / NEJM / The Lancet in the natural-science bundle).jama-internal-medicine.jama-psychiatry / the-lancet-psychiatry.jama-neurology / brain.jama-surgery.[Fit] High / Medium / Low (one-line reason)
[Target] JAMA Pediatrics
[Specialty tags] <2–3 closest child-/adolescent-health topics>
[Study design / reporting guideline] <RCT-CONSORT / cohort-STROBE / review-PRISMA>
[Method/evidence] <does power, age-appropriate outcome, registration, and pediatric ethics clear the bar?>
[Top risk] <the single most likely reason for rejection>
[Official items to re-check] <article type / registration / checklist / assent-consent / ethics / disclosures>
[Re-route suggestion] <if not a fit, a better-matched venue>~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.