imfer-topic-selection — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited imfer-topic-selection (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
IMFER is the IMF's flagship scholarly journal: it rewards rigorous research on international macroeconomics and finance whose findings speak to policy — exchange rates and capital flows, global imbalances, financial crises and contagion, sovereign debt and default, monetary and fiscal policy in open economies, IMF-program-relevant questions, and cross-border spillovers. The double audience is the test: a paper must satisfy a frontier referee on method and give someone who could brief an IMF mission a usable implication. A purely domestic US-macro question, or a methods paper with no open-economy or policy hook, is the classic mis-fit.
| Your question's center of gravity | IMFER fit | If it is borderline |
|---|---|---|
| Capital flows / controls / capital-flow-management measures | Strong — core IMFER | Make the welfare/policy trade-off explicit |
| Sovereign debt, default, restructuring, debt sustainability | Strong — core IMFER | Tie to DSA / program-design relevance |
| Financial crises, contagion, global financial cycle | Strong — core IMFER | Name the cross-border transmission channel |
| Exchange-rate regimes, intervention, reserves | Strong — core IMFER | Avoid a single-country case with no general lesson |
| Open-economy monetary/fiscal policy, spillovers | Strong — core IMFER | Show it is open-economy, not closed-economy macro |
| Pure international trade (gravity, tariffs, firm exports) | Weak — usually JIE | Reframe around the macro-financial margin or redirect |
| Domestic monetary policy, US-only macro | Weak — JMCB / AEJ: Macro | Add the international spillover dimension or redirect |
| Econometric method paper, no policy object | Weak | Anchor on an IMF-relevant application or redirect |
IMFER is the named successor to IMF Staff Papers, and that lineage shapes taste: the journal has long rewarded work that is technically serious yet legible to the policy community, often empirical, often comparative across countries, and explicitly connected to the questions an international financial institution faces. A topic that would have fit Staff Papers — measuring a cross-country regularity, evaluating a policy regime, quantifying a spillover — usually fits IMFER. A topic whose only home is a pure-theory or pure-method audience usually does not. Use the inheritance as a sanity check: would this paper inform an IMF surveillance or program discussion while still passing frontier review?
imfer-robustness).A large share of IMFER content flows through the Jacques Polak Annual Research Conference and its themed special issues (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准). If your paper is invited or you are targeting a call, topic selection is partly alignment: the question should sit squarely inside the issue theme (e.g., a year on "the global financial cycle," "debt in turbulent times," or "trade and financial fragmentation") while still standing as an independent contribution. Read the conference theme as a prior on what the editors find timely, but never bend a thin question to fit a theme — the policy "so what" still has to be real.
resources/official-source-map.md or 待核实A team has clean micro data on a single country's foreign-currency corporate borrowing. As a single-country finance paper it is JIMF or a field journal. The IMFER reframe asks the fit test: the international margin is currency mismatch and the policy decision is whether macroprudential FX limits reduce crisis risk; the general lesson is the mechanism (balance-sheet exposure to exchange-rate shocks), testable beyond the one country; the policy reader is a supervisor designing FX-borrowing limits. With the mechanism foregrounded and a second country added for external validity, the same data becomes an IMFER paper.
【Journal】IMF Economic Review
【Skill】imfer-topic-selection
【Question (1 sentence)】___
【International margin】flows / prices / spillovers / contagion / debt: ___
【Policy "so what"】the decision an IMF/central-bank reader gains: ___
【Audience split】academic referee: ___ | policy reader: ___
【Sibling guard】why IMFER not JIE/JIMF/JMCB: ___
【Verdict】fit / sharpen / redirect
【Next skill】imfer-literature-positioning~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.