ieee-transactions-on-automatic-control — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited ieee-transactions-on-automatic-control (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control (TAC) is the flagship archival journal of the systems-and-control field, publishing rigorous theoretical and methodological contributions across control theory, estimation, optimization for control, hybrid and networked systems, and the mathematics of dynamical systems. The defining expectation is a provable, general result: a new theorem, a new method with guarantees, or a sharp answer to an open systems-and-control question. Application papers that tune a known controller for one plant, or simulation studies without a generalizable theoretical contribution, are a poor fit and are routinely returned. This skill is a fit / venue-selection / re-framing tool. It does not replace the journal's current official author information. Before submitting, re-check the live IEEE TAC author guidance and submission system.
dynamical-systems manuscript and wants a fit/framing check.
general theorem or method statement with explicit assumptions.
automatica, or between a full Paper and aTechnical Note / shorter contribution.
alternative-venue route for application-heavy work.
model-predictive, and geometric control, with new analysis or synthesis results.
filtering, when the contribution is a new guarantee or method, not a tuning.
and quantized control; consensus and distributed optimization with convergence proofs.
rigorous (stability/convergence/regret guarantees), not purely empirical.
stated, non-vacuous assumptions; the generality and tightness of the result are what carry the paper.
under assumptions that effectively presuppose the conclusion is not a contribution.
support intuition but never substitute for the proof.
existing theorems (weaker assumptions, larger class of systems, tighter bound, constructive vs. existence).
mathematically precise before any result is stated.
Technical Notes / Correspondence — match the article type to the size and scope of the contribution, and re-check current definitions on the live guide.
stated as numbered theorems/propositions/lemmas with proofs (in-text or in an appendix per the current format).
not survey applications.
plots); the paper stands on its theorems, not its plots.
../../resources/source-basis.md and../../resources/official-source-map.md; start from the IEEE Author Center anchors, then cite the current TAC-specific page you checked.
authors" and follow the current ScholarOne/IEEE version.
overlength policy, and the IEEE double-column template.
results.
disclosure requirements, and IEEE open-access options.
instructions win.
no generalizable theoretical contribution.
effectively assume the result.
broadening of the system class.
with control only as a label.
automatica.ieee-transactions-on-signal-processing.ieee-transactions-on-power-systems / ieee-transactions-on-power-electronics.ieee-transactions-on-robotics / the-international-journal-of-robotics-research.[Fit] High / Medium / Low (one-line reason)
[Target] IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
[Topic tags] <2–3 closest control subtopics>
[Contribution type] theorem / method-with-guarantee / open-problem answer
[Method/evidence] <does the result clear the generality + proof-rigor bar?>
[Top risk] <the single most likely reason for rejection>
[Article type] Paper / Technical Note
[Official items to re-check] <article type / length / template / data-code / disclosures>
[Re-route suggestion] <if not a fit, a better-matched venue>~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.