gec-workflow — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited gec-workflow (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
The orchestrator for a Global Environmental Change submission. Figure out the stage and the format, then send the user to the matching skill. GEC publishes work on the human and policy dimensions of global environmental change — so the router's first job is to confirm the paper has a significant social-science component and a real-world / policy payoff, not just an environmental result.
gec-revision-and-rebuttal)| Situation | Format | Route to |
|---|---|---|
| Full original study, broad significance | Research Article (up to 8,000 words) | normal pipeline below |
| Distinctive viewpoint / agenda-setting argument | Perspective (up to 3,000 words) | gec-conceptual-framework + gec-writing-style |
| Integrative synthesis needing methods/data analysis | Usually Research Article | gec-literature-positioning + gec-conceptual-framework |
| Prospective design, data not yet collected | plan transparency early | gec-research-design + gec-review-process |
The 8,000-word and 3,000-word caps were refreshed from the official Guide on 2026-06-20. Re-check the live Guide before filing, especially for special issue instructions.
Idea / fit? → gec-topic-selection
Where does it sit in the field? → gec-literature-positioning
What is the framework? → gec-conceptual-framework
Is the design defensible? → gec-research-design
Are the analyses sound? → gec-data-analysis
Are the exhibits clear? → gec-figures-and-tables
Does it read for a broad audience? → gec-writing-style
So what for policy / practice? → gec-policy-relevance-and-implications
How will it be judged? → gec-review-process
Ready to submit? → gec-submission
Got an R&R / decision? → gec-revision-and-rebuttaltopic-selection → literature-positioning → conceptual-framework → research-design → data-analysis → figures-and-tables → writing-style → policy-relevance-and-implications → review-process → submission → revision-and-rebuttal
Iterate: most papers loop framework ↔ design ↔ analysis several times before writing-style.
【Stage】idea / positioning / framework / design / analysis / exhibits / writing / policy / review / submit / revise
【Format】Research Article / Perspective / Review / other
【Route to】gec-<skill>
【Why】one line
【Then】the next skill after that../../resources/external_tools.md — data sources + software by method../../resources/official-source-map.md — official GEC URLs behind every fact in this pack~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.