gcb-workflow — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited gcb-workflow (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
The orchestrator for a Global Change Biology submission. Figure out the stage and the article type, then send the user to the matching skill. GCB publishes mechanistic links between global environmental change and biological systems — the router's first job is to make sure the paper leads with a driver → biological-response mechanism of broad relevance, not a local description or a conservation-management plan.
gcb-revision-and-rebuttal)| Situation | Article type | Route to |
|---|---|---|
| Completed original study, broad global-change relevance | Primary Research Article | normal pipeline below |
| New tool / method / modelling approach | Technical Advance | gcb-study-design + gcb-data-analysis |
| Integrative synthesis of a literature | Research Review (open) / GCB Review (invited) | gcb-literature-positioning + gcb-writing-style |
| Argued position / forward-looking view | Opinion (~3,000–5,000 w) / Perspective (~1,500 w) | gcb-topic-selection + gcb-writing-style |
GCB Reviews are commissioned; the Research Reviews section is open for unsolicited submission. Live-check the current article-type list and caps in the official Wiley guidance before submission.
Idea / global-change fit? → gcb-topic-selection
Where does it sit in the field? → gcb-literature-positioning
Is the design defensible? → gcb-study-design
Are the analyses sound? → gcb-data-analysis
Are the exhibits mechanistic? → gcb-figures-and-tables
Data & code archived? → gcb-reporting-and-data-policy
Does it read for GCB? → gcb-writing-style
Cover letter for the editor? → gcb-cover-letter
How will it be judged? → gcb-review-process
Ready to submit? → gcb-submission
Got a decision / revision? → gcb-revision-and-rebuttaltopic-selection → literature-positioning → study-design → data-analysis → figures-and-tables → reporting-and-data-policy → writing-style → cover-letter → review-process → submission → revision-and-rebuttal
Iterate: most papers loop design ↔ analysis ↔ figures several times before writing-style.
When a user arrives mid-stream with a complaint rather than a stage, route by symptom. Each row sends the question to the sub-skill that owns the fix.
| User says | Underlying issue | Route to |
|---|---|---|
| "Editor desk-rejected on scope" | Fit/significance framing | gcb-topic-selection then gcb-cover-letter |
| "Reviewer says it's correlative" | Mechanism not tested | gcb-study-design + gcb-data-analysis |
| "Can't scale plot to biome" | Uncertainty not propagated | gcb-data-analysis |
| "Graphical abstract rejected" | Non-mechanistic exhibit | gcb-figures-and-tables |
| "Data statement non-compliant" | Archiving gap | gcb-reporting-and-data-policy |
A user returns with a major-revision letter on a remote-sensing carbon-flux paper. The router reads the decisive comments: the mechanism is called correlative and the scaling lacks uncertainty. It dispatches first to gcb-data-analysis to add an ensemble and partition uncertainty, then to gcb-figures-and-tables to make the driver-response panel lead, then to gcb-revision-and-rebuttal to assemble the response. It also confirms the Zenodo code archive is re-tagged via gcb-reporting-and-data-policy. The order is driven by which comments the editor flagged as decisive, not by the default pipeline. Scenario is illustrative.
【Stage】idea / positioning / design / analysis / exhibits / data-policy / writing / cover-letter / review / submit / revise
【Article type】Primary Research Article / Technical Advance / Research Review / Opinion / Perspective
【Route to】gcb-<skill>
【Why】one line
【Then】the next skill after that../../resources/external_tools.md — global-change data + software by method../../resources/official-source-map.md — official GCB URLs behind every fact in this pack~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.