eursr-submission — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited eursr-submission (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
The last check before submitting through ScholarOne Manuscripts (mc.manuscriptcentral.com/esr). ESR is double-blind, so the most common avoidable failure is an under-anonymized manuscript; the second is a missing or vague Data Availability Statement. Verify volatile specifics (caps, policy dates, editors, any fees) on the official OUP/ESR page first.
non-profit under German law hosted at the WZB Berlin), published by Oxford University Press. Scope: sociology with a quantitative emphasis.
(verified 2026-06-22 via ECSR, OUP, and Wikipedia; re-confirm the full team/term on the live Editorial Board page, as offices rotate).
mc.manuscriptcentral.com/esr.your own work** but not in identifying wording.
excluded); longer papers are considered, but reviewers judge whether the contribution justifies the length. (Some renderings cite a stricter cap — confirm the current figure; 待核实.)
5 Sep 2022).
deposit a package as a condition of publication (assemble it now; typically required at conditional acceptance). Qualitative work is exempt. Restricted/confidential data are accommodated via shareable code plus a documented access path (no need to deposit the raw data itself).
OUP sets the exact ESR APC on its live charges page and does not publish a stable figure — confirm the current amount and any read-and-publish/transformative-agreement waiver there. Acceptance rate, time-to-first-decision, and reviewer count are not verified in the source map — check the live OUP/ESR page; do not quote a figure.
eursr-tables-figures)| Trip-wire | Consequence | Fix before upload |
|---|---|---|
| Author names / identifying acknowledgments in the file | anonymity broken | strip them; use system fields |
| "in our prior study" wording | de-anonymizes the author | neutralize to "in a prior study" |
| Endnotes/references left out of word count | over the target on recount | count text + endnotes + references |
| No / vague Data Availability Statement | desk return under policy | name archive, version, access condition |
| Statistical paper, no package plan | stalls at conditional acceptance | assemble the package now |
An author preps a comparative panel paper for ScholarOne upload.
Body + endnotes + references: 8,140 words → near ~8,000; brief justification added for the extra
Abstract: 192 words, no institutions named → within ≤200
Anonymity sweep: 4 self-citations reworded; acknowledgments removed; document properties cleared
DAS: ESS open + register via DUA, code provided → drafted
Package: master.R + harmonization + README + seed=2026, deposited on Zenodo (statistical → not exempt)Caps verified on a recount including endnotes and references, a clean anonymity sweep, and the data statement plus package ready — the most common avoidable returns pre-empted before upload.
lines, and metadata; identifiers belong only in the ScholarOne fields.
the contribution justifies the length (hand to eursr-writing-style).
(hand to eursr-transparency-and-data).
the most common avoidable cause of a return.
a replication package are part of the submission posture; treat volatile dates/figures as provisional and verify live.
【Type】Article (~8,000) / Comment-Reply / Data-Brief — cap met or length justified? [Y/N]
【Anonymous】no identifiers + self-refs neutralized + metadata clean? [Y/N]
【Abstract】word count (≤200), non-identifying?
【Style】English + author-date consistent? [Y/N]
【DAS + package】statement drafted + package ready (or exemption noted)? [Y/N]
【Next】await decision → eursr-rebuttal on R&R../../resources/external_tools.md — reference managers, anonymization, repro tooling../../resources/official-source-map.md — official ESR / OUP / ECSR URLs behind every fact in this pack~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.