est-submission — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited est-submission (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
The last check before pressing submit on the ACS Publishing Center (peer-review environment: ACS Paragon Plus). The most common avoidable failures at ES&T are a missing TOC graphic, an over-limit word count, or an absent data-availability statement. Verify volatile specifics on the official page before relying on them.
(Critical Review) ~10,000; Perspective ~4,000; Policy Analysis ~7,000; Viewpoint ~1,000 (+≤5 refs); Letter to the Editor ~500. Figures/tables may count as word-equivalents (~300/600 — 待核实).
Policy Analysis; not for Viewpoints/Spotlights/Letters.
describing contents and file type.
in public databases (see est-reporting-and-reproducibility).
AI-use disclosed in Acknowledgments; ORCID for the corresponding author (待核实 on exact requirement).
est-figures-and-tables)est-cover-letter)These are the failures that bounce a manuscript at or just after upload — before science is judged. Each line is a hard gate; confirm the volatile specifics on the live ACS page (待核实):
| Gate | Pass condition | Where it is fixed |
|---|---|---|
| TOC graphic | present + spec-compliant for this article type | est-figures-and-tables |
| Word count | within cap incl. figure/table word-equivalents | est-writing-style |
| Supporting Information | separate file(s) + SI paragraph | est-reporting-and-reproducibility |
| Data-availability statement | present with accession/DOI | est-reporting-and-reproducibility |
| Citation style | ACS numbered throughout | est-writing-style |
| Declarations | COI, coauthor consent, safety, AI-use | this skill |
A Research Article on basin methane attribution, the night before upload (illustrative):
(~600 illustrative) → ~6,800, under the ~7,000 cap. Pass.
the flux map. Pass.
SI; processed fluxes and inversion code on Zenodo with a DOI; data-availability statement written.
Acknowledgments; corresponding-author ORCID linked (待核实 on exact requirement).
what keeps the paper under cap. This is the single most common avoidable over-limit failure.
【Type】Research Article / Critical Review / Feature / Perspective / Policy Analysis (cap met? Y/N)
【TOC graphic】required + present + spec-compliant? [Y/N]
【SI + data-availability statement】present, with accession/DOI? [Y/N]
【ACS style + ORCID】[Y/N]
【Ethics/COI/safety】declared? [Y/N]
【Cover letter + ≥4 reviewers】ready? [Y/N]
【Next】await decision → est-revision-and-rebuttal../../resources/external_tools.md — reference managers, ACS templates, deposition repositories../../resources/official-source-map.md — official ES&T URLs behind every fact in this pack~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.