ectheory-workflow — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited ectheory-workflow (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
ET, published by Cambridge University Press and founded by Peter C. B. Phillips, publishes the mathematical and statistical foundations of econometrics — asymptotic theory, probability-theoretic methods, time series and nonstationarity, high-dimensional and non-standard environments. Papers are theorem-proof in style with supporting lemmas, derivations, and often Monte Carlo or numerical illustration. From 1 January 2026 three joint Editors-in-Chief (Guggenberger, Su, Sun) succeed founding editor Phillips, with a program of invited papers with discussions and themed special issues.
ectheory-topic-selection (is the result general + foundational enough?)
▼
ectheory-literature-positioning (stake the theorem against the frontier)
▼
ectheory-identification-strategy (assumptions, regularity conditions, asymptotics, proof plan)
▼
ectheory-contribution-framing (state the theorem so its generality is legible)
▼
ectheory-data-analysis (Monte Carlo / numerical illustration, if any)
▼
ectheory-tables-figures (simulation tables, limit-behavior plots, self-contained notes)
▼
ectheory-writing-style (proof exposition, notation discipline, APA references)
▼
ectheory-replication-and-data-policy (reproducible computation + ET Supplementary Material file)
▼
ectheory-review-process (war-game referee objections; single-anonymous reality)
▼
ectheory-submission (ScholarOne single-PDF preflight; Article vs Miscellanea; 50-page ceiling)
▼
ectheory-rebuttal (response strategy when the decision letter arrives)ectheory-identification-strategyectheory-topic-selection + ectheory-contribution-framingectheory-submission (overflow to online Supplement) + ectheory-tables-figuresectheory-data-analysis + ectheory-replication-and-data-policyectheory-rebuttalThe fastest route is by symptom. At Econometric Theory the recurring bottlenecks are about the theorem and its proof, not about empirical design — route accordingly.
| Symptom in the manuscript | Likely diagnosis | Route to |
|---|---|---|
| A regularity condition is too strong or not primitive | assumption defect | ectheory-identification-strategy |
| A rate is stated but no limiting law | missing distribution theory | ectheory-identification-strategy |
| The introduction buries what is proved | framing defect | ectheory-contribution-framing |
| Referee will call it a special case | positioning gap | ectheory-literature-positioning |
| Monte Carlo never visits the boundary | weak finite-sample evidence | ectheory-data-analysis |
| Proof overflows the page ceiling | length / Supplement | ectheory-submission + ectheory-replication-and-data-policy |
A draft proves a new estimator's rate but states no limiting law and reads as incremental. The router sends it first to ectheory-identification-strategy (supply the limiting law and verify the assumptions are primitive), then to ectheory-contribution-framing (re-lead the introduction with the theorem), then to ectheory-data-analysis for a boundary-spanning Monte Carlo, and only then to ectheory-submission for the single-PDF preflight. The order is deliberate: at a theorem-proof venue the math must be sound before any framing or formatting work pays off. Confirm volatile process facts (length ceiling, submission system) against the journal's current author guidelines as you reach the submission stage.
Treat this skill as an executable review pass, not a prose hint. First lock the primitive assumptions, theorem statement, proof route, and example showing why the result matters; then judge whether the current manuscript answers the venue's real reader: econometric theorists who read for assumptions, theorem novelty, proof architecture, and relation to known asymptotics.
claim / evidence / risk / manuscript location rows, so the next agent can edit rather than rediscover the issue.resources/official-source-map.md has been checked for volatile rules and the manuscript has one concrete fix for the largest venue-specific risk.【Stage】topic / proof / framing / simulation / writing / submission / rebuttal
【Article type】Article or Miscellanea (and why)
【Bottleneck】one sentence
【Next skill】ectheory-...~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.