devpsych-writing-style — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited devpsych-writing-style (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Writing well for Developmental Psychology means making a credible developmental-change argument in APA 7th-edition style, sized to the right length tier, with the journal's two distinctive front-matter elements done right: the abstract and the Public Significance Statement. The prose should foreground change (age, trajectory, mechanism), not just a finding measured in an age group.
~10,500 words for a larger research report, and ~15,000 words for a multi-study or comprehensive longitudinal report; total length counts the cover page, abstract, text, references, tables, and figures.
significance of the study, in lay-accessible language, on the abstract/keywords page.
(change/age/mechanism), and the contribution early (see devpsych-literature-positioning).
measures, effect sizes with CIs, missing-data handling — so the study is evaluable and replicable.
for theory; state constraints on generality (ages, cohorts, populations) and limitations honestly.
families, educators, clinicians, or policy — no jargon, no overclaim beyond the design.
"kids"), author–date citations, and statistics with effect sizes and intervals.
For the three-wave effortful-control package; confirm current length rules on the official page.
Abstract (excerpt): In a preregistered three-wave study of 300 children
(ages 4-8), effortful control showed positive within-person growth
(latent slope b = 0.42/year, 95% CI [0.31, 0.53]); higher maternal
scaffolding at wave 1 predicted steeper growth (b = 0.18 [0.07, 0.29]).
Measurement invariance held across waves. ...
Public Significance Statement (2-3 sentences, ~30-70 words):
This study shows that young children's self-control grows steadily between
ages 4 and 8, and that supportive, contingent parenting early on is linked
to faster growth. The findings suggest that helping caregivers scaffold
self-control in the preschool years may pay developmental dividends.| Section | Note |
|---|---|
| Introduction | developmental question, gap, contribution by paragraph two |
| Method | JARS detail: sample, ages, measures, invariance plan, missing-data model |
| Results | effect sizes + CIs; invariance reported before change; figures embedded per APA |
| Discussion | meaning of the change + constraints on generality + limitations |
| Public Significance Statement | 2-3 lay sentences on the developmental relevance |
| Online supplemental material | robustness, full models, extra studies — keeps the tier in budget |
【Length tier】brief / larger / multi-study-longitudinal — within limit? [Y/N]
【JARS】method + results give required detail (ES+CI, exclusions, missing data)? [Y/N]
【Abstract】APA-style, within ceiling, change foregrounded? [Y/N]
【Public Significance Statement】2-3 plain sentences (~30-70 words)? [Y/N]
【APA 7th】headings, bias-free + age-precise language, citations? [Y/N]
【Next】devpsych-open-science-and-transparency../../resources/external_tools.md — papaja, reference managers, JARS checklists../../resources/official-source-map.md — length tiers, abstract, Public Significance Statement, APA 7th + JARS~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.