demog-workflow — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited demog-workflow (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
The orchestrator for a Demography submission. Figure out the stage and the article type, then send the user to the matching skill. Demography is the multidisciplinary flagship of the Population Association of America — the router's first job is to confirm the paper poses a genuine population-science question (how populations change, or why, and with what consequences), not a study that merely uses demographic data in passing.
demog-rebuttal)| Situation | Type | Route to |
|---|---|---|
| Full original population study | Research Article (<= 8,000 words) | normal pipeline below |
| One focused, self-contained contribution | Research Note (<= 4,000 words) | normal pipeline, tighter scope |
| Short response/perspective on published work or a debate | Commentary (<= 2,000 words) | demog-literature-positioning + demog-writing-style |
Word caps are main-text counts (exclude abstract, keywords, footnotes, acknowledgments). Confirm current caps on the official page (see 待核实).
Idea / fit? -> demog-topic-selection
Where does it sit in the field? -> demog-literature-positioning
What's the argument/mechanism? -> demog-theory-building
Is the demographic design sound? -> demog-research-design
Are the analyses sound? -> demog-data-analysis
Are the exhibits clear? -> demog-tables-figures
Does it read for population sci.? -> demog-writing-style
Data statement & repro package? -> demog-data-and-reproducibility
How will it be judged? -> demog-review-process
Ready to submit (ScholarOne)? -> demog-submission
Got an R&R / decision? -> demog-rebuttaltopic-selection -> literature-positioning -> theory-building -> research-design -> data-analysis -> tables-figures -> writing-style -> data-and-reproducibility -> review-process -> submission -> rebuttal
Iterate: most demographic papers loop theory <-> design <-> analysis several times (e.g., choosing among life-table, decomposition, event-history, or APC framings) before writing-style.
decomposition, or an event-history model
Run this as a concrete capability pass. First lock the demographic process, data source, time scale, selection/migration/mortality issue, and uncertainty; then test whether the manuscript addresses population-science reviewers who inspect demographic process, measurement, cohort/period logic, and population validity.
claim / evidence / blocker / next edit rows so the next pass can patch the manuscript directly.resources/official-source-map.md for volatile rules and name the one unresolved fact that could change the recommendation.【Stage】idea / positioning / theory / design / analysis / exhibits / writing / data / review / submit / rebut
【Type】Research Article / Research Note / Commentary
【Route to】demog-<skill>
【Why】one line
【Then】the next skill after that../../resources/external_tools.md — population data + demographic software by method../../resources/official-source-map.md — official Demography URLs behind every fact in this pack~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.