curranthro-submission — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited curranthro-submission (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
The last check before submitting on Editorial Manager (CA's submission system). CA is published by the University of Chicago Press for the Wenner-Gren Foundation; its Major Articles will, on acceptance, receive the CA✩ Treatment — simultaneous publication of multiple peer commentaries with your Reply (Major Articles only; not Reports/Forums/Discussion items). The most common avoidable failures are wrong article-type/word-count fit, figures embedded in the PDF instead of supplied as separate files, and an unresolved ethics or permissions issue. Verify volatile specifics on the official Instructions for Authors before relying on them.
Anthropological Research. Founded 1959 (Sol Tax). ISSN 0011-3204 (print) / 1537-5382** (web).
University), effective 1 January 2025, succeeding Laurence Ralph (Princeton) — the first cross-disciplinary, first Australia-based editorial team (verified 2026-06-22; re-confirm on the live masthead, as editors rotate).
about 50% receiving full peer review (the other half screened/desk-handled before full review), and about 10% accepted — (year-dependent operating figures, not a standing promise; 需复核).
five–six major articles plus reports/other content.
access is available for authors with qualifying funder requirements; the editor may select one article per core issue* for open-access availability — (confirm current OA/APC terms on the rights page; 需复核)*.
≤ 200 words; up to 12 figures/tables) — receives the CA✩ Treatment; Report 3,000–5,000 words (incl. refs/notes; abstract ≤ 200; up to 4 figures/tables); Forum; Discussion / Comment ≤ 800 words including references (reply to a CA piece from roughly the prior 8 months); Current Applications** (open-access section).
(graphs and images) as separate TIFF (`.tif`) or EPS (`.eps`) files.
Style author-date, references alphabetized and not embedded in endnotes; include DOIs**.
forums, discussion items, and commentaries.
to anonymize.
curranthro-transparency-and-data).doc/.rtf text + separate TIFF/EPS【Article type】Major Article / Report / Forum / Discussion / Current Applications (cap met? Y/N)
【Word count + abstract】within cap / ≤ 200? [Y/N]
【Files】single .doc/.rtf text + separate TIFF/EPS figures? [Y/N]
【References】Chicago author-date plan + alphabetized + DOIs? [Y/N]
【Ethics statement】consent / IRB / heritage / anonymization present? [Y/N]
【Copyright】Wenner-Gren assignment rights confirmed? [Y/N]
【Next】await decision → curranthro-rebuttal on R&R or to write the CA✩ Replytemplates/checklist.md — full pre-submission checklist for CA../../resources/official-source-map.md — official CA / Wenner-Gren / UChicago Press URLs behind every fact in this pack~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.