cogpsych-submission — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited cogpsych-submission (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
The last check before submitting through Elsevier Editorial Manager. Two things sink Cognitive Psychology submissions most often: a wrong-shape contribution (single effect, no model/theory, or a model that is never compared) and non-reproducible modeling (fits that can't be regenerated, no code deposit). Verify volatile specifics (length, abstract limit, review model, current editor, declarations) on the official guide for authors first (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准).
articles; multi-experiment programs combined with formal/computational modeling.
problem-solving, judgment and decision-making; modeling/neuroscientific approaches and substantive reviews welcome.
authors. Confirm the current reference style and any structured-abstract requirement.
materials; complete the Elsevier research-data statement and declaration of competing interest**.
any word/length guidance, and the abstract limit on the live page. 待核实.
Running the recognition-memory program through the gate the night before upload:
Shape: 3 experiments + UVSD vs. DPSD comparison → theoretical advance → PASS
Model: both models fit (matched flexibility); dBIC + BF reported;
parameter + model recovery included → PASS
Hierarchy: hierarchical Bayesian; R-hat ~ 1.00, ESS adequate → PASS
Exhibits: z-ROC figure overlays observed data + both model curves; model-
comparison table with free-parameter counts → PASS
Open sci: data + model code + materials each have a DOI; fits regenerate
in a fresh session (run log attached) → PASS
Declarations: competing interest (none) + research-data statement + funding
completed in Editorial Manager → PASS
Verdict: ready to upload to Editorial Manager.| Failure | Caught by | Quick fix |
|---|---|---|
| Model fit but never compared | scope/shape check | fit the rival; add the comparison table |
| Fits don't regenerate from code | reproducibility check | deposit seeded code + a fresh-session run log |
| Bars of means, no model overlay | exhibit check | redraw with observed data + model fit |
| "Data on request" instead of a DOI | open-science check | deposit and mint a persistent identifier |
| Competing-interest/data statement blank | declaration check | complete the Elsevier declarations before upload |
Volatile specifics (length guidance, abstract limit, review model, current editor, exact declarations) change. Re-confirm every item above against the journal's current guide for authors before relying on it (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准).
【Shape】theoretical advance via a program; model fit + compared? [Y/N]
【Format】abstract + keywords + APA-style reporting + Elsevier formatting? [Y/N]
【Modeling】comparison + recovery + hierarchy + diagnostics? [Y/N]
【Open science】data + model code (reproducible) + materials + DOIs? [Y/N]
【Declarations】competing interest + research-data + funding? [Y/N]
【Next】await decision → cogpsych-rebuttal on revisiontemplates/checklist.md — the eight-section pre-submission self-check../../resources/external_tools.md — repositories, DOIs, modeling/reproducibility tooling../../resources/official-source-map.md — official Cognitive Psychology / Elsevier URLs behind every fact in this pack~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.